Rose Croix Veritas

 Rennes le ChateauA French MysteryThe Holy GrailShugboroughMary MagdaleneFrench FreemasonryPoussinThe Rose LineThe debunkersLandscape Geometry    Zodiac de RennesTeniersGRAIL COUNTRYMegalith StudyGeometryPriory of SionSauniereDe Cherisey ConfessionRebuttal AnsweredInterviews17th JanuaryDossiers SecretLobineau DocumentLe Serpent RougeNoel CorbuThe London ConnectionLa Vraie Langue CeltiqueEt in Arcadia EgoThe Da Vinci Code    Henri BoudetParchment 1Parchment 2Otto RahnMartinistSaint MichaelTarotDa Vinci CodeLuciferGisorsRLC Treasures


MEGALITH STUDYCeltic Cross Mystery

DisclTHE FORUMaimer




ET IN ARCADIA EGONothing of what concerns the SHEPHERDS of Poussin's ARCADIA can leave us indifferent: as far away from the "loneliness" as of confusion, héritièrs of the humanism of Alberti and precedes of David or of Puvis de Chavannes, such a composition is solemn classicism. The concise inscription which justifies it inspired, these last years, of rather hot discussions summarized by Mr. Weisbach in the Gazette of the Art schools December 1937.

Several essential facts emerge from this study: I - the sentence AND IN ARCADIA EGO appears to us for the premiére time in a table of Guerchin preserved at Galleria Nazionale of Rome, it there is engraved on a block of masonry and comments on a cranium which two shepherds contemplate, pressed on their sticks; one then finds it, about 1620-1630, in a first version of the Poussin table collected by the Collection of the Duke of Devonshire with Chatsworth; it is read finally in the centre of the famous table of the Louvre; its origin is forgotten, "all gives to believe that it was there, at the time, a very known saying, whose we are unaware of the source", this source is not ancient, it should be sought, undoubtedly, in the néo-Latin humanistic literature and could be contemporary painters. II - the direction of the sentence AND IN ARCADIA EGO is dubious. "interpretation that one (in) generally gave, during time" is as follows: ` Me also, I lived in Arcadie, and I knew the bonheur' there; ` it is at Goethe, Schiller, Nietszche, to quote only some large names', but it is already, with few things close that the biographer and friend of Poussin, Felibien, who writes:


"By this inscription one wanted to mark that that which is in this burial lived in Arcadie, and which death recontre among the greatest happiness". But, Mr. Erwin Panofsky, in Philosophy and History essays presented to Ernest Cassirer, Oxford, 1936, breaks with the tradition, "

the word AND can be reported only to IN ARCADIA and not not with EGO. If one wants to comment on the table of Guerchin correctly, it is necessary to compensate verb SUM and to give for subject to this I AM, the cranium which symbolizes abstracted Death ", one must thus read:

"Me, Death, I exist even in Arcadie".

This reading would be also valid for the first Poussin version, which exposes a cranium on its sarcophagus.

For the table of the Louvre, whose monument is of a whole nudity, the direction should be modified a little: "it would be the tomb itself which would speak": such a interpretation that Mr. Panofsky maintained, defended and specified in answer to Mr. Weisbach in the issue of May-June 1938 of the Gazette of the Art schools, would be confirmed by the paraphrase of Bellori:

Et in Arcadia ego, cioé che il sepolcro si trova ancora in Arcadia, e che la Morte ha luogo in mezzo le felicità".

Lastly, Mr. Weisbach proposes a third reading: the word AND would be referred to IN ARCADIA as Mr. Panofsky thinks it, but it died it well which would speak and would proclaim: "Even in Arcadie, I had to suffer death", i.e.:

"Even in Arcadie the country of happiness, me, it died, I was not saved by Death"

or more explicitly still:

"Me also, which enjoyed happiness in Arcadie, I had to undergo death, and I gis in this tomb".

It is perhaps not useless to pour a new part with this file of an inscription illustrates... The German engraver of the Renaissance Heinrich Aldegrever (born in Paderborn about 1502, resident with Soest until 1555), left a engraved portrait of the chief of the Anabaptists Jean Beuckelsz, said Jean de Leyde, carried out after the death of the character who was torture victim on January 27, 1536. However, this print, which poses many curious problems (cf Emile GAVELLE. - Cornelis Engebrechtsz. Lille, 1929, p.328), are cornea of a distich singularly close to the text whose Poussin made fortune; the chimerical king who had died in the sufferings after a transitory reign of which he had wanted to make a Golden age, addresses to the spectator in "beautiful towards melancholic persons":


 Confronted with that of Guerchin and Poussin, this inscription suggests the following remarks: I - Here a text engraved former to us texts painted; it notes like them it brittleness of happiness, and, like them, ends in EGO; it does not give their exact precedes but indisputably attaches them to a tradition which goes up at least in the medium of 16th century. II - In this text of 16th century, it is well a death which speaks and not an abstraction. EGO rejected at the end of the speech expresses the return of late on itself which confront in only one word of a poignant concision what it was, and what it is. Such a constation vigorously does not invite us it to push back the assumption of M, Panofsky which hears in Guerchin and Poussin the inhuman voice of one entitié:

Death or the Tomb? Lastly, the clearness of the opposition of the opposition established at Aldegrever between the past and the present, the life and the incurable nostalgia of death, wouldn't it advise us, in some measurement, to reject the reconciling but slightly hard solution of Mr. Weisbach who weakens contrast by diluting the thought?

Isn't the traditional reading, which in our tables, attaches AND and EGO, yet the best? The philologists, Mr. Weisbach notes it, there would not see absolute opposition, "if this bringing together corresponded to a correlation of facts", but in the current state of our knowledge it would be necessary to stick to one "not liquet". This darkness had not obstructed, until now, any the well-read men, large or small, who had adapted the formula to their humanistic nostalgias.... One should not, now, lira like them, while specifying a little:

"Me also, I lived in Arcadie happy - and I died."

Very finely, Mr. Panofsky gave like ancestors to our shepherds the Three Sharp ones in contemplation in front of the Three Dead ones. The engraving of Aldegrever would invite us to attach the inscription: AND IN ARCADIA EGO with the epitaphs boldly antithetic of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance.


Bulletin of the Survey firm of the 17th century (Number 18; 1953)



Golden Age Restored 



Nicolas Poussin, Pope Alexander VII and Christina of Sweden and the Roman Connection

“There is no higher religion than the truth”

Motto of the Theosophical Society


As we have already hinted at previously in April 1656 the Abbé Fouquet wrote to his brother Nicolas Fouquet who was the superintendent of finances at the court of Louis XIV. The passage is well known and its authenticity is not disputed. It says: 

“He [Poussin] and I discussed certain things, which I shall with ease be able to explain to you in detail – things which will give you, Through Monsieur Poussin, advantages which even kings would have great pains to draw from him, and which, according to him, it is possible that nobody else will ever discover in the centuries to come. And what is more, these are things so difficult to discover that nothing now on earth can prove of better fortune nor be their equal”



Rome and when he died in 1665 he was buried in the church of San Lorenzo in Lucino close to the Via del Corso in Rome itself.  In 1830 the French nobleman Chateaubriand[I1]  made a dedication of a sculpture I2] in the church to Poussin. Out of the 350 or so paintings done during Poussin’s career that he could have chosen from, Chateaubriand chose the theme ‘Les Bergere d’Arcadie as the sculpture. Why was this one chosen – again? At the bottom is an inscription that says:




Do not cry piously, in this tomb Poussin lives

He has given his life without knowing himself how to die

He is quite here but, if you want to hear him speak,

It is surprising how he lives and speaks in his paintings

Poussin was born in Les Andelys, France in 1594. Les Andelys is a beautiful town in Normandy where Richard Coeur de Leon (Richard I of England and Duke of Normandy) had built the Chateau Gaillard[I3]  on the site of a former Druidic Temple. was from a poor family, his father had been a soldier, and he received most of his early professional training at home. The story is that during this period Poussin wandered around France plying his trade as a painter but nothing remains of his work from this period. At the recommendation of itinerant painter called Quentin Varin, Poussin left for Paris in 1612 where he entered the workshop of the mannerist painter J. Lallemald. His training was enhanced by independent study of Italian art from the Royal Collections. By the end of the first decade of the 17th century Poussin became a master in his own right and received commissions for the decoration of the Luxembourg Palace in Paris, and the altarpiece Assumption of the Virgin. From this period of his Paris period (1612-23) only his drawings based on Ovid’s Metamorphosis have survived. In 1622 Poussin was eventually commissioned by the Jesuits to do a painting in a Notre Dame chapel[I4]  and as a result he came to the attention of Giambattista Marino, the celebrated Italian poet then at the Tuscan court of Marie de Medici[I5]  who was the author of the epic poem L'Adone[I6]  which was dedicated to the young King Louis XIII. Marino was from Calabria and had been greatly inflenced by the polymath and scientist Giambattista Della Porta who had written Magiae Naturalis (Natural Magic) and in this book he had covered a variety of the subjects that he had investigated, including the study of: occult philosophy, astrology, alchemy, mathematics, meteorology, and natural philosophy. Another subject that he was famous for had been cryptography about which a collector of cryptographic historical documents Charles J. Mendelsohn commented:

“He [Della Porta] was, in my opinion, the outstanding cryptographer of the Renaissance. Some unknown who worked in a hidden room behind closed doors may possibly have surpassed him in general grasp of the subject, but among those whose work can be studied he towers like a giant.”

 Giambattista Della Porta described the first known digraphic substitution cipher which foreshadowed the concept of polyalphabetic substitution cipher which the Vigenère cipher used in the Shepherdess Parchment which introduces Poussin to this story is probably the most well known example.


Marino had also followed the philosophy of the heretics Giordano Bruno[I7] , best known as a proponent of the heliocentric theory (whom we shall discuss later in more detail), and Tommaso Campanella who was also from Calabria. Campanella, a Rosicrucian,


He had claimed that he could:


“Make a city in such a wonderful way that only by looking at it all of the sciences could be learned”


He called this



 Poussin went with Marino to Italy in 1623, first to Venice then in 1624, he went to Rome. The 1620s in Italy were years of intensive learning for Poussin with some active creative work and after only four years he was commissioned to paint an altarpiece for a chapel in St. Peter’s Cathedral Martyrdom of St. Erasmus which occupied him from 1628 until 1629). At that period he acquired the style that we now know as Baroque and this culminated in The Virgin of the Pillar Appearing to St. James the Greater, which was ordered for a church in the Spanish Netherlands.


Marino had died in 1625 after only a few short months leaving the thirty year old Poussin alone and without means in a strange city and he was forced to do manual labour. Eventually Poussin made friends in Rome with other classical scholars, who played the main role in turning Poussin into a philosopher, erudite and intellectual

Eventually this work reached the attention of the influential Cardinal Richelieu and finally came to Louis XIII and to the Louvre. Poussin was evidently frustrated and disappointed by his lack of success in the intensely competitive field of baroque altarpiece painting and he never attempted this style again. In 1629, Poussin married his landlord’s daughter and during his first period in Rome (1624-30) Poussin concentrated on mythological themes, with scenes of sweet love and inspiration from poetical works. Towards the end of the 1620’s early 1630’s Poussin painted a work that is currently in the Gemaldegalerie in Berlin called Helios and Phaeton with Saturn and the Four Seasons. The theme alludes to Ovid’s story of Phaeton, son of Helios, and his attempt to drive the golden chariot with four h

orses yoked across the sky normally driven by his father. Hours yoked the horses for Phaeton and Dawn threw open her doors and he set off. But he had no skill and was soon in trouble and the climax came when he met the fearful Scorpion of the Zodiac and he dropped the reins. The horses bolted and caused the earth to catch fire. In the nick of time Jupiter, father of the God’s stopped the runaway chariot with a bolt of lighting and sent Phaeton down to earth and into the River Eridanus where he was buried by nymphs. The devoted friend of Phaeton was Cygnus who strove to resuscitate Phaeton Jupiter took pity on Cygnus and turned him into a swan and placed him into the sky. In the painting Poussin has used the Sun-God Helios in the form of Apollo; Phaeton kneels in front of him asking if he can drive the chariot.  

In the next decade history became the main subject of Poussin’s work. In his paintings of the 1630s the compositions are complex and compound with many characters, they remind of the classical tragedy on stage. In this period Poussin painted his Les Bergers d’Arcadie. Poussin used a special box and moulded wax figures. He first he built his compositions, then started to draw preliminary sketches, and only then did he paint. Other best-known works of the period are – The Rescue of Pyrrhus (1634), The Noble Deed of Scipio (1640) and very popular in his time were the so-called bacchanal series, commissioned especially by Cardinal Richelieu. One of these paintings is Triumph of Neptune and Amphitrite (1634). Those paintings were supposed to decorate the cardinal’s palace, and this fact indicates that the interest to Poussin in France grew. In the second half of the 1630s the young artists in Paris chose to follow Poussin’s style in historical genre. The King’s officials wanted to return the artist to France but Poussin did not hurry back. He came to France only in 1640, after being virtually threatened by the King and it is interesting to note that also at this same time another invited to France against his better judgment was Giovanni Domenico Cassini[i8] , the mapmaker. In Paris Poussin was immediately appointed the person in charge of all art works in the King’s palaces. This caused violent jealousy on the part of other court artists; Vouet headed the opposition. For about two years Poussin painted altarpieces and canvases for Richelieu who also supervised the decorative works in the Grand Gallery in Louvre. His time in Paris was an unhappy time for Poussin and significantly in our story he only produced two paintings during this period.

His schism with Caravaggio is well documented; Poussin detested the affected airs of the ‘fashionable’ painters like Caravaggio.  He declared that Caravaggio was out to destroy painting and called his work “painting for lackeys”. From this it is clear that Poussin sought to achieve by his doctrine of ‘imitation’ to reproduce nature in his paintings with conformity and reality and in his letters it is clear that held a great interest in archaeology and collected old coins and became a scholar of Greek mythology. He used scientific methods, measuring statues, consulting bas-reliefs, studying painted vases, sarcophagi and mosaics. What is strikingly obvious when one studies Poussin is that he never painted scenes from the Gospels and when he did paint Christ he was always depicted as a weak or submissive character, for example the painting called ‘Penitence’ where he has his feet being anointed by Mary of Bethany (The Magdalene) painted for Versailles but now in the Louvre. He produced few paintings whilst at the behest of Cardinal Richelieu in Paris. ‘Penitence’ was painted for the church of St Germain en Laye at Versailles. Another painting he produced during this period was “The miracle of St Francis Xavier” which he painted for the Jesuit novitiate. The third is a round ceiling painting called the ‘Triumph of Truth’ this he did for Richelieu’s chateau at Rueil. The only portrait he ever painted was of himself and it is once again enigmatic for in the background is an unknown painting of a Romanesque woman embracing someone out of the picture, her headdress shows the Third-Eye.


In the late 1620s, Nicholas Poussin produced a number of sketches of the Annunciation, culminating in two paintings from the 1650s, one of which still survives at Chantilly. One feels the need to ask why Poussin should paint this theme twice in such a short space of time. The Annunciation depicts Mary, mother of Jesus receiving the word from the Archangel Gabriel that she will conceive Jesus six months after Elizabeth, the wife of Zacharie conceived John the Baptist. Internal evidence suggests a 15th-century influence in the first of Poussin’s paintings of the Annunciation, and the relative positions of the figures in the painting and particularly the wings are reminiscent of that in another Annunciation painted by an unknown artist. It resembles that of the Aix panel, a triptych that one London Times correspondent on the 21st January 1932 once wrote was, in his opinion, painted by a “Satanist and probably an ecclesiastic”. This suggestion carries some weight because the then Archbishop of Aix, Robert Mauvoisin was accused of sorcery and convicted of having celebrated Black Masses with the blood of small children and was condemned by Pope John XXII.  There is no denying that his early 1655 painting of the Annunciation clearly shows the Archangel Gabriel with eagle’s wings and clearly is a copy of the triptych at Aix en Provence. On studying Poussin’s earlier work this does appear to be a shift from what we have come to expect, however in a short space of time he paints another depiction of the annunciation and this time the angel is fundamentally different.  

Annunciation 1655 Annunciation 1657

             Both paintings by Nicolas Poussin 

But perhaps the most striking aspect of the Aix triptych is its title given to it by the inhabitants of Aix. They have given it the curious nickname:


“Le diable a vecu tranquillement dans son stoup saint de l’eau”


“The devil lived quietly in his holy water stoup”


Curiously Poussin reproduced a second version of this theme of the Annunciation in 1657 (shown on the right) and one is reminded that Poussin’s enigmatic meeting with the Abbé Fouquet took place in between these two works in 1656. The iconography is very unusual; Mary sits cross-legged like an eastern woman, her arms open wide, while the angel makes hieratic (priestly) gestures rare in 17th-century Annunciations, but more common in the 15th century depictions. Dr Jane Costello, an authority on the Valguarnera trial that involved Nicolas Poussin, is of the opinion that this painting was a design for a funeral monument to Poussin's friend and mentor Cassianio Del Pozzo, a distinguished antiquarian scholar. If this is the case this is a decidedly odd theme for a funeral monument. Pozzo was to be buried in the Church of Santa Maria Topa Minerva, which stood on the site of an ancient sanctuary of the goddess Isis, and Friedlaender suggests that Poussin's painting combines the characteristics of three divinities - Mary, Minerva and Isis. He also observes that the posture of the female figure seems to represent the sedes sapientiae - seat of wisdom.


What is the difference between the two paintings? Well the two most striking differences are the wings of the angel and the clothing of Mary, in the 1655 version they are eagle’s wings but in the 1657 painting they are the wings of a Swan.


Poussin is known to have been a profound student of ancient myths from original sources including Ripa's Iconologia and apparently constantly carried Cartari's Images of the Gods with him. He embodied Neoplatonic doctrines in his paintings and it is widely accepted that Poussin's paintings contain multiple layers of meaning, often blending Pagan and Christian themes and one of the major sources of this learning was from the library of Pozzo.


The second Annunciation is the only late painting by Poussin that is signed and dated. It also contains a large inscription to commemorate the fact that it was painted in the reign of the Fabio Chigi otherwise known as Pope Alexander VII (1599-1667). Poussin might have been thought to take quite a risk when he mentioned the Pope in such a painting, but it seems that he knew exactly what he was doing. Alexander VII, elected Pope in 1655 (the year of Poussin's first Annunciation), had put an end to the Heliocentrism issue that had been proposed by Copernicus a century earlier and had published his Index Librorum Prohibitor Alexandri VII Pontificis Maximi jussu editus which he prefaced with the Bull Speculatores Dominus Israel. It should be said that in 1655, when Poussin painted his first Annunciation, the astronomer Picard had measured a degree and from it the size of the earth.

At this point a prominent Alchemist and Rosicrucian enters our story, she is Queen Christina of Sweden who was born on a prominent astrological conjunction and whom Pope Alexander VII personally baptized her into Catholicism on Christmas Day 1655 after her abdication in 1654. She later fell out with the legate in Rome, more on this enigmatic lady[i9]  later.

 The church of Rennes le Chateau has a stained-glass-window of Mary of Bethany anointing the feet of Jesus. In the Catholic Church it is accepted that Mary of Bethany is Mary Magdalene but not so in Protestant churches. To the left is another of Poussin’s paintings depicting this scene painted by Poussin in 1646 during his second period in Rome after returning from Paris.

 This painting is called PENITENCE and one is reminded of the pillar underneath ‘Our Virgin of Lourdes’ in the Rennes le Chateau church garden were Saunière placed the words ‘PENITENCE PENITENCE’.

If you remember the reason we involve Poussin in this mystery at all is the mention of him in the parchment text. It says:


Arcadia, first referred to by the Roman writer Virgil. This is a scene from what is generally known as the ‘Golden Age’ of man. They are contemplating the message ‘Et in Arcadia ego’ written on this tomb suggesting that even an idyllic world there is always death – “and in Arcadia I (death) am present” hardly the Christian message of everlasting life and Poussin is by no means the only painter to have covered this theme.


The concept of a Golden Age is a common feature amongst many cultures, in India for example it is called Satya Yuga and a few modernists notably Walter Cruttenden have surmised in his book entitled Lost Star of Myth and Time that these ages have a basis of fact that is indirectly due to the motion of the solar system around another set of stars and galaxies. Cuttenden makes a convincing argument that our Solar system is a in a binary system with Sirius.  

Arcadia as a theme in their writings. One literary work which directly alluded to in Lady Anson’s letters is “L’Astree” by Honore D’Urfe. She had five volumes of the 1617 edition of Astree and these are still in the library at Shugborough. L’Astree is the French equivalent of Sidney’s Arcadia but the idealised setting is in France not Greece it is also mixed with Protestant propaganda. In this version the Shepherdess is Astree named after the Goddess of Justice who is called Astrea by Virgil and Ovid. Astrea is the Virgin daughter of Zeus and Themis and is likened to the constellation of Virgo and is the Goddess of Justice because of the close proximity of the scales of Libra, she is depicted on top of the Old Bailey in London, the British Law Court[i10] . In the French version of l’Astree the shepherds and Shepherdess live on the banks of the river Lignon just west of Lyon. Interestingly this story features a Druid called Adamas and this appears to be the very first occasion in literature where the Druids are mentioned. The story also includes Meroveus (Mérovée) the principle king of the Merovingian dynasty. Madam Helena Blavatsky also identifies Astrea as the constellation of Virgo in her Theosophical Glossary.


Elizabeth Yorke (Lady Anson of Shugborough Hall 1750) in a letter to  speaks of the “Gentil Berger” and she remembers that since she left “les delectables rives de votre belle Lignon” (delectable banks of the beautiful Lignon) she has never ceased remembering the happy moments among the “ces Vallons Fleuis, ces Collines ombrageuzes, ces Eux claires et andoyantes, et sur tout ces Bergers et Bergeres so courtois et aimable qu’un le trouve”. (These small flowered valleys, these ombrages hills, these Eux Clairs and Andoyantes and on all these Shepherds and Shepherdesses courteous and pleasant that one finds there), she continues that her heart merits the name of “Mirroir de la Vraie Reconnaissance” (Mirror of the true Reconnaissance) a feature of Astree. She also alludes to the “Fontaine de la Verite d’Amour (Fountain of true Love) in the Palace of Isoure in which true lovers could see themselves before the evil fairy put a spell on it. One month prior to her writing this letter in August 1750 Lady Anson wrote to her sister-in-law Jemima Grey informing her that she is copying the Duke of Devonshire’s picture “5, 6, 7 or 8 hours a day” that had been lent to her at her father’s London home at Carshalton, this is the first version of the shepherds of Arcadia that Poussin painted which is still on show at Chatsworth House, the ancestral home of the Duke of Devonshire. Lady Anson died in 1760 and is buried in the Colwych parish church of Saint Michael and All the Angels and this is very significant to our story.

Golden Age this perfect world was under the rule of Saturn and in his fourth Eclogue he includes the prophecy of the return to this Golden Age, clearly an allusion to astrology. He says:


“Iam redit et virgo redeunt Saturnia regna” –


“Now returns Virgo, and returning Saturn reigns”


Arcadia. A drive at Shugborough on the way to Tixall Hill crosses the river Sow and the bridge carries the inscription that is straight from Ovid’s Golden Age: 

"Here is perpetual spring."


Et in Arcadia Ego. It is usually forgotten that the only reason we discuss Les Bergere d’Arcadie with respect to Saunière and his apparent wealth is entirely due to the large encoded parchment. The decryption says ‘Poussin Teniers Guard the Key’ and as encryption rarely uses superfluous lettering then we are talking of a specific key. This painting does indeed ‘Guard the Key’ The Key of Solomon’s Temple and remember that the name Solomon is made up of three words that mean the Sun - SOL OM ON. Why should Poussin be able to discuss “certain things” with a French priest who was brother to the king’s superintendent of Finance? Well the king of France was about to undertake a large expensive project to fix a meridian line and map the whole region of his influence and he would employ the best astronomer of the time Cassini in order to do this. Additionally Louis XIV (The Sun King) was also involved in a major project to remodel Paris as a Sun Temple involving the Italian architect Bernini.  


Poussin did not finish his work in Paris and fled back to Rome, the reason normally given is that other artists, like Simon Vouet became jealous. It was in this period that Poussin also stood in some kind of conflict with the monarch. From 1642 until his death in 1665 Poussin continued to work mainly in historical genre back in Rome and this included the Seasons series (1660-64) which includes the painting for autumn entitled Grapes of the Promised Land showing some Blue grapes the size of Apples being stolen, a passage from Numbers 13:23 featuring a place called The Brook of Eshcol.


One will recall that a similar tomb as the one in Poussin’s painting used to be situated at Les Pontils close to the road from Couiza to Arques and despite some incredible and futile attempts to suggest otherwise the tomb was overlooked by Rennes le Chateau up until 1989. It is said that this tomb was built in the 1930s and that because of this the detractors insist that the whole thing must be a hoax and once again we see the strange logic adopted by these people that because a tomb was built there in the 1930s then therefore one wasn’t there before this. I do not propose to waste reams of paper and at the same time bore the reader in order to enter into this discussion save to say that the rebuilding of the tomb in the 1930s in no way proves or even suggests that there wasn’t a tomb there in Poussin’s day. Indeed one could reasonably ask as to why someone thought it prudent to put a tomb in the 1930s (or any other time) on this apparently non-consecrated ground in this very spot of rocky ground that is hardly suited for burial. The site is not even overlooked but it seems that in recent years across the Couiza to Arques road it has become a favourite spot to have ones relatives, usually the female members only, buried.  


Unfortunately one always looks instantly for sacred geometry in both the Poussin and the Teniers paintings and indeed they may well have used this to compose their paintings. But the paintings contain other features that are usual in their own right, for instance the rather odd looking shadow on the tomb cast by the blue shepherd’s arm which is particularly odd since the light source is behind the tomb. The shepherds are usually named by the colour of their respective clothing and that is another feature that must be significant, they all wear different coloured attire. The red shepherd looks around awkwardly with wild eyes at the shepherdess and has quite distinctive russet coloured hair and he points not at the Latin phrase but at the vertical line. I personally am always drawn to the dove-like cloud on the top right of the canvass seemingly holding a branch in its beak. This is perhaps symbolic of  Semiramis (better known to some as the Statue of Liberty) or the branch bearer but then again it could be simply reading into this something that isn’t there. A lot of talk has been made about the similarity of the landscape this is however subjective and may be correct or it may not be. Obviously the central steeply rising mountain towering above the tomb carries come significance and many people have looked for something resembling this in the landscape of France. But as we shall see later a very well known landmark to the west of Rennes le Chateau bears a striking resemblance to the central rock. The steep sides and the castle-like structure on the top is feature of some Cathar castles that seem to blend into the rock foundation there is one such structure and it is shown below. Is the central rock a depiction of Montségur?


The tomb in contains the phrase: ET IN ARCADIA EGO and this phrase is being indicated only by the kneeling blue shepherd. The tombstone apparently over the grave of Marie de Blanchefort also carried the phrase but written in Greek lettering. What has been suggested is that the Abbé Bigou made this stone either to cover Marie de Blanchefort’s tomb in the late 18th century or perhaps more likely removed the stone itself that had been placed at the spot at Les Pontils in the 17th century. It is really unlikely that we shall ever get any positive confirmation of this so perhaps we can look at this tombstone itself and discuss it, whatever the origin these two, the painting and the tombstone, are to be viewed together because of the phrase ‘Et In Arcadia Ego’ that they both contain.


The slab stone of Marie de Blanchfort is shown below left, the most obvious piece of lettering is the repeat of the phrase from the Poussin tomb ET IN ARCADIA EGO written down the sides using the Greek alphabet. This tombstone is now missing or possibly defaced, for there is a stone that has clearly been systematically defaced in the Rennes Museum and a noble lady of Marie de Blanchefort stature would have had a flat stone over her grave. There are many features here that are worthy of comment. The presence of this stone was attested by an Ernest Cros in the 1930s. It is important to know that older drawings of this stone feature the crosses inside a triangle the one on the right having the letter ‘I’ also inside the triangle.


RÉDDIS RÉGIS you will recall was mentioned by a researcher from the 1960s and means Return of the King. The CÈLLIS ARCIS may well refer to the Celestial Arc, the arc described by the meeting of the equatorial and the ecliptic (more on this later). Although this is bad use of the French language (a common feature of this story) it probably refers to the practice of Kings regaining their crown on the alignment of some celestial event. This is of course precisely what Jesus did, hence the Magi following the star of Bethlehem to worship he that is called King of the Jews. The vertical line on the tomb splits the phrase in two after the word AXRC (a possible reference to the RosaeXCrucis) and before. The original author clearly felt the need to place the XI inside the so it must be significant.


What remains is more interesting, firstly there is this unusual P – S with a crudely drawn spiral around it. This is not, as some have said, a representation of the Priory of Sion because it says P – S not PS, in other words it means P to the S and spiralling back again. This immediately draws us to a document deposited in the Bibliothèque Nationale and, perhaps wrongly in this case, referred to as the Priory Documents called Le Serpent Rouge. Le Serpent Rouge is a stanza written by three persons who a supposedly hanged themselves within a day of each other, most likely names taken from newspaper articles. The poem is subtitled Notes on Saint Sulpice and Saint Germain des Prés’, it does not specifically refer to Rennes le Chateau.


A characteristic of Le Serpent Rouge is that they are always linked to a Zodiac sign. One of the verses called Scorpio says:



There is a celestial vision for the one who recalls the four tasks of EM. SIGNOL around the line of the meridian; the same Choir (heart) of the sanctuary from which radiates the source of love for one another. I turn looking at the rose of P then to that of the S. Then from the S to the P until my mind is dizzy. The spiral in my mind becomes like a monstrous octopus expelling its ink, the shadows absorb the light. I put my hand to my mouth, biting my palm, maybe like OLIER in his coffin. Curses, I know the truth, HE HAS PASSED, in doing GOOD as did HE of the flowery tomb. But how many have pillaged the HOUSE, leaving only embalmed corpses and a number of metal things they could not carry? What strange mystery is concealed in the new Temple of SOLOMON, built by the children of ST. VINCENT?

That this refers to the Rose Line in the church of Saint Sulpice in Paris needs little confirmation, the phrase ‘from which radiates the source of love for one another’ is obvious reference to the Rose and this church has been known for most of its existence as the New Temple of Solomon. The writer of this verse in the Le Serpent Rouge mentions Emile Signol and his controversial four works of the Rose Line Gnomon much despised by the painter Eugene Delacroix and the rose is of course the symbol of love for one another. It is important to state that the construction of the gnomon was not thought of until 1727 by the then priest of Saint Sulpice Languet de Gercy, this was 62 years after the death of Poussin. The reason was to help calculate the time of the equinoxes (day and night equal) and accurately mark the time of Easter, it being held on the first full moon after the spring equinox. 


If you stand on the copper strip that denotes the Rose Line of Saint Sulpice and look north and south there are two ‘Rose’ windows that have a P and an S intertwined. The authorities say that these refer to St Peter and St Sulpitus and this is very likely correct. Saint Peter (feast day June 29 - In the Zodiac sign Cancer) is of course Simon Peter: The Fisherman. He is the first Pope and all Popes wear the Fisherman’s ring, here he represents the Roman Catholic Church. Saint Sulpitus on the other hand is Sulpitus the Pious (or the Débonaire). Saint Sulpitus’ feast day is the 17th January, a date close to the winter solstice that keeps recurring. It should be noted that the 17th January is the day that the sign of Aquarius starts in France.


What the writer of the verse in Le Serpent rouge is referring to here is that the fixing of the line is controversial and alternates between the two feast days. Another church on the Rose line less than a ten minute walk away called St Germain des Prés. This church has a rose boss in the ceiling that shows S – P separated by a crown.


“….rose of P then to that of the S. Then from the S to the P until my mind is dizzy


The rebuilding of the church of St Sulpice commenced in 1645 on the site of an older church that had been on the fields (prés) of the Abbey of St Germain and interestingly now we find that this Abbey of St Germain had been the necropolis of the Merovingian Kings of Neustria, an area of France that contained Soissons and later Paris that stretched from Aquitaine to the English Channel and from the Bay of Biscay to another Merovingian Kingdom of Austrasia. Dagobert II had reigned over (he did little actual ruling) Austrasia but had never ruled Neustria. He was assassinated probably on the orders of the mayor of the palace of Neustria who went by the name of Ebroin on December 23rd 679CE.  After this the two kingdoms, Neustria and Austrasia, were united under the rule of Theuderic III. The Abbey of St Germain became the richest place in France in the 11th century and housed the Scriptorium and was the centre of intellectual life. The Abbey was frequently set on fire and plundered by the Normans and finally completely destroyed by them in the 9th century. The philosopher Rene Descartes is buried in the church of St Germain des Prés.


St Germain himself (not to be confused with St Germaine whose statue is featured in the church of Rennes le Chateau) studied at a place called Avalon, a castle outside the village of Pontcharra in Isère in Eastern France. The Merovingian king Childebert I, son of Clovis I and Saint Clotilde detained St Germain in Paris in 555CE and made him bishop where he exercised great influence on the king apparently healing him of a sickness. St Germain died in 576CE and is buried in a church in St Symphorien which he had founded and dedicated to St Vincent. The Abbey of St Germain des Prés in Paris was built by another Merovingian king Childeric I and this too was originally dedicated to St Vincent and called Sainte-Croix-et-Saint-Vincent (Holy Cross of St Vincent). Thus the ‘Children of St Vincent (mentioned in Le Serpent Rouge) are the intellectuals that studied at the Abbey of St Germain des Prés which is the ground on which the church of St Sulpice is built.


What is the alleged tombstone of Marie de Blanchefort doing showing information that pertains to a church in Paris? If we examine this stone in detail we have a straight line going down the middle to the words PRÆ- CUM and underneath an Octopus. This is the Octopus expelling its ink as described in Les Serpent Rouge and the French for Octopus is the nickname for the pulpit in the church of St Sulpice which is La Poulpe. The pulpit of St Sulpice was a gift from the Doge of Venice to Francois I King of Portugal. This ‘joke’ is perhaps saying that what is preached from that pulpit is designed to obscure and confuse like a monstrous octopus expelling its ink, the shadows absorbing the light.


The words PRÆ- CUM are an enigma and other than it making up the letters in order to get the correct 128 letters for the code, at first glance seems out place. It can mean “Before – Since” or “Beside – With”. Taken in context it should mean that the P – S with the spiral is on a line that is ‘Before’ and ‘With’ the Pulpit. P probably is a reference to St Peter, one of the saints of St Sulpice and the S is St Sulpice himself. P to the S may well involve the change between the two dates (June 29th and 17th January) of these two saints in order to fix the meridian.  


But the curious thing to be considered is the crosses placed within the phrase ЕТ ІΝ АXРХ--А∆XІА ЕГΩ with an obvious reference to the meridian and St Sulpice on the rest of the stone this does seem out of place here, irrespective of whether the stone was contrived in the 1960s or not. Why is the phrase broken by these crosses, which are not simply crosses but are Templar crosses? The Greek letters Rho and Chi (ΡΧ) are placed side by side rather than vertically and Delta and Iota (Δ Ι) are also placed thus this time with the cross in between, in its simplest form this could mean a triangle plus a line and Rho Chi ρχ could be a reference to the Rose Cross, however reversing this it becomes Chi Rho or Christ the anointed one. A line drawn from this cross to the other cross cuts the vertical meridian at 240º/60º.  


Lastly we have the Roman numerals at the bottom right.




These numerals are ambiguous[I A11]  because there are no gaps and thus one can read this in several ways but if one reads it as 59º 59’ 50” then this is very close to the angle created by the two crosses.


The group of letters could of course, in the tradition of Poussin, have meanings on several levels, but is so obscure one would need other information in order to ascertain the exact meaning. Whether contrived during the 1960s or not the tombstone is clearly associated with the Poussin Tomb through the phrase ET IN ARCADIA EGO therefore its dating is irrelevant to our search.


This Latin phrase is Poussin’s reference to Virgil’s fifth eclogue and is the second painting of his to carry this reference. Poussin’s first version is at Chatsworth House and was painted in 1627, but Poussin was by no means the first to use this phrase in a painting, Guercino had painted a version of two shepherds contemplating a tomb with a trepanned skull[i12]  on the top and painted five years earlier both of these paintings are called ET IN ARCADIA EGO.


Yet another enigma exists here, why does the phrase start with the word ET meaning AND, implying that something was said before this phrase is uttered. Legend has it that the Arcadians were a native tribe that inhabited the Peloponnesian area of Greece a tribe described as ‘older than the moon’. According to Curtis N Runnels there may well be a tribe that fits the description and they may well be 50,000 years old which he described in the March 1995 edition of Scientific American. The popular term Arcadian describes a utopian garden paradise where people pass their time in a serene existence drinking wine and dancing and generally having carefree existence until they come across the message reminding them that all these things must pass.


The Rennes researcher Philip Coppens says this version of the phrase stems from 1640, he says:

This version goes back to ca. 1640. Poussin apparently used the poem of Jacopo Sannazaro, dating from 1502, who transforms the Arcadia of Virgil in a Utopian world. Apparently, the specific lines of interest of this poem are 257-267 and speak about the tomb of Phyllis: "I will make your tomb famous among these rustic people. The shepherds will come from the hills of Tuscany and Liguria to adore this corner of the world only because you were here in the past. And they will read on the beautiful square monument the inscription which pains my heart at all time, and the scars strangle me with so much pain inside: 'she who was always shown so haughty and rigid in Meliseo we now find buried, soft and humiliated, in this cold stone'."


Le Serpent Rouge tells us how to interpret the tombstone containing the phrase although the inclusion of the Latin phrase ET IN ARCADIA EGO written in Greek is not explained. Poussin changed the design of the tomb in the second painting and despite futile efforts to say otherwise is similar to the real tomb that was at Les Pontils up until 1989. Prominent Rennes researcher Pierre Jarnac concluded that this tomb at Les Pontils was started in 1903 by Jean Galibert who buried his wife and grandmother there but later their remains were brought to Limoux in 1921 and the land was sold. One is reminded that 1903 is during the height of Saunière’s building activities at Rennes le Chateau and the tomb is overlooked by the village despite over-enthusiastic if futile efforts to prove otherwise. The tomb was apparently rebuilt in 1933 and nobody seems to ask the question as to why this spot is so attractive in order to continually want to bury the female members of one’s family on this particular rocky ridge. Today across the road there appears to be some more tombs in what appears to an expanding graveyard. The photograph one normally sees is the 1933 version of this tomb. Somehow all of this 20th century building activity is presented as proof that a tomb wasn’t there in Poussin’s day, I am at present unable to see why this is so, surely if a tomb can be rebuilt once it can be rebuilt twice or several times. The ‘it-was-all-done-in-1933’ story always smacks as an over-desperate attempt to play this down – They doth protest too much methinks. That it was built in 1933 in no way proves that a tomb wasn’t there in Poussin’s day and the similarity of the designs, whilst not offering proof, gives one reason to give it our attention. This unconfirmed story surrounding this is that the ET IN ARCADIA EGO tombstone was lifted from a previous Les Pontils tombstone by the Abbé Bigou and placed over the tomb of Marie d’Hautpoul in the churchyard at Rennes le Chateau. If it is the one that is normally shown then there is a definite reference to the Paris meridian using the text from the Scorpio verse of Le Serpent Rouge and thus the from P to S is the two churches St Germain des Pres and St Sulpice both of which straddle the line and the Octopus is La Poulpe the pulpit in St Sulpice. You are reminded that no actual tomb appears to exist for Marie de Blanchefort despite her being a prominent landowner in the area, this in itself is odd.

Meridian markers at the side of the Coiza arques road

The new and old Paris Meridian markers at the side of the Couiza - Arques road.

Within a few hundred yards of the Poussin Tomb.  


The Tomb at Les Pontils does seem to have been a popular place to bury only the female members of ones family. The tomb which existed until 1989 was erected on the edge of a rocky cliff by a little bridge that passes over the bed of a stream that is now dried up. This stream was known as 'La Cruce' (which seems to be a Spanish word for The Crossing). The story of how it came to be there is a story that some people have felt it necessary to falsify for their own subversive reasons but it is actually quite well known. The tomb was at the Moulin des Pontils and in 1880 this property was purchased by Louis Galibert, who came to live there with his wife Elisabeth. M. Galibert,  planned to transform the former mill into a factory for the manufacture of epaulettes and braid for military uniforms. This small factory was to take its power from the water flow which ran several machines. M. Galibert’s grandson had a grave erected there in 1903 and a tomb was constructed by a stonemason from Rennes-les-Bains called Bourrel on the hillock located some fifty metres from the Couiza to Arques road. The following year the remains of his grandmother were transferred there. Twenty years later the Galibert family left to live in Limoux and sold their estate. In 1921, Louis Galibert had the remains of the bodies (his wife Elisabeth had also since been buried there) and their remains were transferred to a cemetery in Limoux. The gate and the facings in freestone of the tomb of Les Pontils were removed and used to cover the tomb in Limoux. The buildings of the Moulin des Pontils were bought by Madame Emily Rivarès, a French woman born in Paterson in the United States and her son, Louis Bertram Lawrence, born on 25 October 1884 in Hartford (Connecticut). Lawrence’s daughter Madame Marie Rivarès died on 28 November 1922 a year after moving to Les Pontils and the body was embalmed. It was there in the tomb prepared originally by the Galibert family that Louis Lawrence buried the body of his daughter. Rather odd that he should consider a used tomb as appropriate resting place for his immediate family. Some time later, in 1931 or 1932, he did the same thing again upon the death of his mother, Emily Rivarès, whom he laid to rest in the tomb with the remains of two mummified cats.


Interestingly another painting by Poussin featuring a tomb similar to the one at Les Pontils has recently come to light. The painting is officially listed as lost however a seventeenth century engraving of the painting does exist. It is said that the original was painted by Poussin for the Cardinal Rospigliosi in the period 1639-1640. Cardinal Rospigliosi later became Pope Clement IX. This painting is called Le Repos Pendant la Fuite en Egypte à l’Eléphant (Rest on the flight to Egypt and the Elephant) and it depicts Joseph, Mary and baby Jesus and some angels resting during their apparent escape to Egypt. There is also an unidentified male with a beard reclining in the foreground to the right of the group. In the background is an Elephant half obscuring a tomb of identical proportions to the one at Les Pontils.


So let us sum up here regarding this tomb at Les Pontils. A tomb resembling the one in Poussin’s Les Bergers d’Arcadie was, up until 1989, within eyeshot of Rennes le Chateau. This tomb is close to the Paris Meridian and is a feature in some landscape geometry.


Despite painting some 300+ paintings Poussin’s Shepherds of Arcadia is by far his most popular painting and is even featured on his tomb in Rome and a frieze at the stately home of Lord Anson of Lichfield in England with a coded message underneath. The wife of Lord Anson is also featured in a painting shown holding a scroll with Les Bergers d’Arcadie on it. Clearly the painting holds some significance and if the reason for the interest was mundane we would now be in total possession of all the facts as to why the special interest.  


The Poussin’s painting carries the phrase ET IN ARCADIA EGO as does a tombstone purported to be that of local noble landowner Marie de Nègre d'Ables dame d'Hautpoul Countess of Blanchefort and who despite being an obviously important person in the area does not appear to have any other tombstone or headstone.


Poussin himself appears to have some secret surrounding him with regard to his “speaking of many things…that even kings will have great pains to draw from you” with the Abbé Fouquet, brother of King Louis XIV’s superintendent of finances Nicolas Fouquet and possibly with his two curious paintings of the Annunciation painted either side of this enigmatic conversation.  Shortly after this Nicolas Fouquet was arrested on nebulous charges of sedition and imprisoned for the rest of his life having become exceptionally rich. However the superintendent’s mother and the surviving brother mobilized the Compagne de Saint Sacrement whose membership included one of the judges appointed to preside over Nicolas Fouquet’s trail. Fouquet’s imprisonment coincided with Poussin’s death in Rome. Nicolas Fouquet’s grandson however became some of the most important people in France becoming the Marquis of Belle-Isle in 1718 and obtained many other territories in France, one of them being Gisors. Indeed in 1742 he became also the Duke of Gisors the place where Gérard de Sède had first learned of the secret of Rennes le Chateau from a man who had been a guard there in the Castle.    


But we must not lose sight of our starting point for this mystery, Beringer Saunière and his apparent sudden wealth that is associated with some secret.


So can the phrase ET IN ARCADIA EGO be associated with Saunière? Not directly, although we did hear from Gérard de Sède and Noel Corbu that he went to Paris to obtain copies of three paintings including Les Bergers d’Arcadie. What can we be certain of here? So far I have suggested that Saunière was involved in some esoteric circles and whilst not being proven there is sufficient reason to suspect he was involved by the indications within his church in his associations we know he made, his choice of reading material and from known objects found within his possessions.


If we can pull all things in together we do find a long line of coincidences.


Apart from the close proximity of the Tomb at Les Pontils to the tomb on the Poussin painting and to the parchment text another possible link can be made through the phrase ET IN ARCADIA EGO and the phrase Blue Apples. We know that Poussin was an almost passionate scholar of Greek mythology and we also know that Poussin living at a time when enlightenment was showing up advances in astronomy.


It is true that lights appear in Saunière’s church on the 17th January at around midday. The lights aren’t blue but they do emanate from a stained glass window in the south wall of church which shows the raising of Lazarus which does contain circles of blue glass. We have seen that throughout this whole story the name Lazarus keeps showing up time and time again. He is reported by many to be the brother of Mary of Bethany (who also appears in the church) from this we can assume that Roman Catholic sources would regard him as the brother of Mary Magdalene also.


These so-called Blue Apples fall on the altar of the church at midday on the 17th January. Obviously it is the timely movement of the seasons which are critical for this timing.


ImageThe key here is Greek mythology and astronomy and with this in mind we will take another look at the famous Poussin painting Les Bergers d’Arcadie (The Shepherds of Arcadia). We know that Arcadia is an idealized place in the Peloponnesus; it takes its name from the mythical character Arcas, son of Zeus and Callisto. Here we have our first clue because Callisto is the Goddess of the Great Bear Ursa Major. In Greek mythology Hera (Zeus’ wife) got jealous after her affair with Zeus and turned Callisto into a bear. Years later Callisto recognized her son by Zeus and approached him, in his fear he tried to kill the bear not recognizing his mother. Zeus seeing this took hold of them and turned them into neighbouring constellations. When she saw them both as glittering stars Hera went to the Ocean to meet Thethys and Oceanos. She told them the story and asked that neither of them Callisto and her son Arcas should ever touch the sea and these constellations never do in the northern hemisphere. Nicolas Poussin painted the seduction of Callisto by Zeus whom he calls Jupiter.  

This story is found in Metamorphoses Book II by the Roman poet Ovid, a book which we know was dear to Nicolas Poussin, where Ovid talks of the seven stars of the bear.


And fondly gaz’d the boy in a fright

And aim’d a pointed arrow at her breast

And would have slain his mother in the beast

But Jove forbad, and snatch’d em through the air

In whirlwinds up to Heav’n, and fix’d em there

Where the new constellations nightly rise,

And add lustre to the northern skies.[i13] 


Take another look at this important painting Les Bergers d’Arcadie. Three shepherds and a shepherdess contemplate a tomb and several features are worth pointing out and we will deal with them in detail from right to left.


The shepherdess has her hand on the Red Shepherd’s shoulder. She has a half moon like face and there is a hint of the rest of the moon made with the leaves of the tree. She wears orange and blue clothes. She is staring at the Blue kneeling shepherd; hand on hip possibly in a gesture of anger. For some reason she is not happy with the kneeling shepherd.


·         The Red Shepherd looks around at the shepherdess, he is watching her. He has quite distinctive red hair and he points not at Et in Arcadia Ego but at a line running down the middle of the tomb.

·         The Blue kneeling shepherd points at the phrase ET IN ARCADIA EGO. His right arm forms a rather unusual shadow on the tomb in the shape of a bow or horn. His right leg is firmly planted on a patch of earth that appears to be separated from the rest of the ground. As though it has been disturbed, even a hole is appearing to the right of his foot. This right foot coincides with the bottom of the white shepherd’s staff.

·         The white shepherd leans languidly on the tomb and is the only one touching it. He doesn’t look at tomb or what the other shepherds are indicating. He appears to be staring at the piece of disturbed earth or the hole in the ground.

·         All the shepherds carry a staff two leaning left and one leaning right and a vertical line on the tomb separates the ones going left and the ones going to the right.

·         All the shepherds are encapsulated in what appears to be a pentagon. 



In the mind of Poussin the shepherdess is Callisto the mother of Arcas from whom Arcadia takes its name.


Callisto is Ursa Major, Ursa being the female bear in Latin.


Arcas is the constellation of Boötes and Arcturus is the alpha star. Arcturus literally means Bear Watcher and Arcas is known as the Bear Watcher hence he looks around in the painting at the bear who is his mother Callisto who was turned into a bear by Zeus and flung into the sky. The arm of Ursa Major points toward Boötes in the sky and this arm is bent in the middle like the handle of the plough. The centre star of the arm of Ursa Major is and double star comprising of Alcor and Mizar they are coloured orange and blue respectively, the same colour as the shepherdess clothes. This double star was discovered during Poussin’s lifetime in ancient times these two stars could be seen separately with the naked eye and seeing these two distinct stars was used as an eye test. They are currently arranged almost one behind the other.

arc-arcturus  bootes 

We must assume from this that as the finger of the Red shepherd is on the line down the centre of the tomb that coincides with the source of light behind the peaks in the distance. So we are looking for a time when Arcturus appears on an east/west line.


Ursa Major has also been known as St Peter’s Barque and it is believed by some to be the Boat of the Dead, which ties in with phrase I (death) am also in Arcadia. Tradition says that Saint Peter was crucified in the Circus Maximus in Rome which is now Saint Peter’s square in the Vatican. This where there stands an obelisk placed there by Pope Sixtus V that acts as a sundial and repeated by Saunière on the cross in the church garden. Saint Peter is said to be buried at the Vatican and Jesus said he is the rock upon which the church is to be built. His feast day is June 29th and you will remember that the Church of Saint Sulpice is dedicated to St Peter as well as to St Sulpice.


From the past it seems that star worshippers have been venerating the Bear as a God for millennia. This period has been given the enigmatic name of the Magdalenian Era. A skull of one of the very first Homo sapiens was found in the Dordogne area and curiously it has been nicknamed ‘The Magdalenian’ and still is described as to have come from “L’Age du Renne (The Age of Rennes)”, described as the “Age of the Reindeer” from the simple, comfortable translation. The veneration of this constellation as a bear has been repeated in North America by the Cherokee, Algonquin, Zuni, Tlingit and Iroquois Tribes.


The Sicambrian Franks with whom the Merovingian bloodline intermarried worshipped the bear in the form of Artemis or more specifically in the form of Arduina[I A14]  the patron goddess of the Ardennes. This form of worship was centred on Lunéville which is close to Stenay (the place where Dagobert II was murdered during the winter solstice and Orval where the Cistercian Abbey called Sion now stands.   


Rennes le Chateau was initially called simply Rennes in the nineteenth century and what is now called Rennes Les Bains was called simply ‘The Baths at Rennes’, so it is clear which village is senior here, not the Spa town that was popular in Saunière’s day but the other with the Chateau on the hill despite the fact that it had no road leading up to it, Rennes le Chateau dominates the whole area from its high position. The whole area is honeycombed with cave systems some natural some dug by gold mining from Roman times and sometimes strange water coursing phenomena can be found indicating an intricate linked underground cave system. From Sauniere’s Tour Magdala it can be seen that we are surrounded by this history of the Albigensian Crusade, Raan’s crusade against the Grail and Blanche de Castille, whose “baggage” it is said has been hidden somewhere around Rennes le Chateau. It was Blanche de Castille who had said immediately prior to the attack on the Cathar stronghold of Montségur that

“The Dragon’s head must be chopped off”.

What did she mean by this statement? The kneeling Blue shepherd is the close by the Red shepherd as the constellation of Boötes is close by the Constellation of Hercules and to Hercules was given the twelve labours.

Like a toiling man, revolves in a form

Nor to what toil he is attached:

But, simply, Kneeler they call him

Labouring on his knees, like one

Who sinks it seems

And his right foot planted on the twisting Serpent’s Head.


Phenomenon – Manilius


Is the twisting Serpent underground is this what the snake charmer (White Shepherd) is staring at? - Certainly because if the tomb forms part of the constellation Ophiuchus then the Serpent snakes underneath this constellation with its tail one side and its head the other. The white shepherd is the head of the snake charmer Serpentarius who is sometimes separated from Ophiuchus (the tomb shaped constellation) but he is the only shepherd who is actually touching the tomb and other connections make him the tomb shaped Ophiuchus. The actual head star is Theta Serpens and is called Alya and is from Al Alyah and is Arabic for ‘Fatty tail of the sheep’. To some this star is the snake’s tail and others the Head of the snake charmer.[i15] 


The blue shepherd Hercules points at the phrase ‘And I am in Arcadia’ and so Hercules was at one point during his labours. In the third labour of Hercules we find that his task was to capture the Cerynitian Hind. Though a female deer, it is fleet footed and had golden horns it was sacred to Artemis, goddess of the moon (Diana, goddess of the hunt), so Heracles (Hercules) dared not wound it. He hunted it for an entire year before eventually running it down on the banks of the River Ladon which rises from the ground in Tripoli in Arcadia. Taking very careful aim with his bow he fired an arrow between the hind’s tendons and bones of the two forelegs, pinning it down without drawing any blood but breaking off its horn in the struggle. Artemis wasn’t happy, but Heracles (Hercules) dodged her wrath by blaming his task master for the twelve labours who was Eurystheus, King of Argos. Argos may be an allusion to the Constellation Argo Navis which contains the second brightest star in the sky Canopus which you will note has a very significant place in our sky.

The twelve tasks of Hercules are most certainly to be associated with the twelve signs of the zodiac.


Hercules is normally painted with a outstretched arm and is normally holding a bow which in French is ‘ARC’. Sagitta is the arrow which is pointed in the direction of constellations depicting two birds: the eagle, Aquila, and the swan, Cygnus and you are reminded here of the two paintings of the Annunciation by Nicolas Poussin painted within two years of each other. Even though our person in the painting is not holding a bow or an arrow it can be seen that this kneeling shepherd Hercules and his outstretched hand indicating the letter R of Arcadia or indeed the word arc and the shadow on the tomb is in the shape of a bow.




Hercules – The Kneeling man


Ladon was the guardian of Hera’s Golden Apples which grow in the Garden of the Hesperides, Hercules (the Blue Shepherd) later killed Ladon to steal the Golden Apples in the eleventh labour. The kneeling blue shepherd is the Constellation of Hercules. The labours of Hercules go like this:


Zeus having made Alcmene, mother of Hercules pregnant proclaimed that the next born son of the house of Perseus would become king. Hera, Zeus’ wife, hearing this, caused Eurystheus to be born early as he was of the house of Perseus, while Hercules, also of the house, was three months overdue. When he found out what had been done Zeus was furious; his rash proclamation still stood. In a fit of madness Hercules slew his wife and children. Realizing what he had done, he exiled himself living alone in the wilderness. His cousin Theseus, king of Athens found him and convinced him to visit the Oracle at Delphi. The Oracle told him that as a penance he would have to perform twelve labours, set by King Eurystheus, the man who had taken Hercules’ birthright and the man he hated the most.

Labour 1   Skin the Nemean Lion

Labour 2   Kill the Hydra

Labour 3   Bring back the Cerynitian Hind

Labour 4   Bring back the Erymanthian Boar

Labour 5   Clean the Stables of Augeas

Labour 6   Scare away the Stymphalian Birds

Labour 7   Capture the Cretan Bull

Labour 8   Cure the Mares of Diomedes of their taste for human flesh

Labour 9   Retrieve the belt of Hippolyte

Labour 10 Fetch the kine (cattle) of Geryon

Labour 11 Fetch the Golden Apples of Hesperides

Labour 12 Bring Cerberus from Hades

 The Line

HERCULES points at the phrase Et in Arcadia Ego

Poussin cleverly makes the arm of HERCULES form the shadow of a bow on the tomb.

Meanwhile it is ARCAS who points at the East-West line below the breaking dawn.

Again this story appears in Ovid’s Metamorphosis which is a book of 15 volumes and we know Poussin studied it and used its themes in several of his paintings. Poussin produced a set of drawings for Marino using Metamorphoses and these are part of the Windsor collection. In his first version of Et in Arcadia ego, currently at Chatsworth House in England and part of the Duke of Devonshire collection, he also features Alpheus the Greek river God and once again this story is told for the first time in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. The poet John Keats also used Ovid’s Metamorphoses as his central theme and referred directly to Poussin’s work on at least one occasion.  Poussin could read Latin at an early age as his mother was the widow of a lawyer and she had hoped Poussin too would become a lawyer. 


The white shepherd is also close by and also above the others on the same level as the shepherdess and can be encapsulated in Cornford’s Pentagon. The identity of this constellation is less obvious and instinct says that he is the constellation of Serpentarius, the Snake Charmer or Asclepios, son of Apollo and Coronis and demigod of Medicine. Coronis fell in love with Ischys. A crow informed Apollo of the affair and he sent his sister Artemis (Diana) to kill Coronis. Her body was burned on a funeral pyre staining the feathers of the crow permanently black. Asclepios was bought up by Chiron, the centaur who was also involved with Hercules in his labour to bring back the Erymanthian Boar. Asclepios (Aesculapius) is the God of medicine and is always shown with a staff with a serpent around it and symbolises doctor’s surgeries and hospitals. You will notice in the Poussin painting that the white shepherd’s staff coincides at the bottom with the right foot of the blue shepherd who is Hercules whom you will remember from the Manilius poem as “Labouring on his knees, like one Who sinks it seems And his right foot planted on the twisting Serpent’s Head”. You will also notice that the white shepherd’s staff has a spiral running all the way up it.


On October 9th 1604 a supernova, the second within a generation,[i16]  appeared in the constellation of Ophiuchus and was known as Keplar’s Star[i17]  and there is little doubt that Poussin would have been aware of this. This is the last supernova that has appeared in our galaxy and is 20000 light-years away and was visible to the naked eye. However over the years there have been five supernovae reported in the constellation of Ophiuchus alone. The first was reported by the Greek astronomer Hipparchos in 134BCE followed by a second reported in 123CE, another in 1230, the one reported by Johannes Keplar in 1604 and another in 1848. In the next chapter we will discuss the Rosicrucians and this supernova of 1604 which forms part of their doctrine along with another astronomical event that marks the Golden Age of mankind.


Returning to our theme:

Shepherdess No temptation Poussin Teniers Guard the key PAX 681 by the cross and this horse of God I complete this daemon guardian at midday Blue Apples.


  • We know that the Blue apples appear under the altar under a cup with a stone in it on the 17th January.
  • We know that this phenomenon is caused by the window depicting the Raising of Lazarus.
  • We now know that the Poussin painting is primarily to do with the constellations and their movement and gives an allusion to Lazarus.
  • Ursa Major (The shepherdess) is the double star Mizar/Alcor and the Christian Arabs regard the ‘tail’ of the bear as a funeral procession that includes Mary, mother of Jesus, Mary Salome and Mary Magdalene. The funeral is that of the Magdalene’s brother Lazarus, the biblical character that was born again who is mentioned alongside Mary of Bethany in the parchment plain text.


The key linking this with Saunière here appears to be the raising of Lazarus, one of only two people in the New Testament who were resurrected from the dead, the other of course being Jesus. And one is reminded that the hand gesture of the Red Shepherd is the same as the hand gesture used by Jesus in the painting of raising of Lazarus. In the Masonic ritual for the ‘Poor candidate in a state of darkness’[i18]  , a special hand grip is used to raise the new initiate into a state of being born again.


One important point must be made here that owing to the comprehensive renovation of the church the Blue Apples phenomenon is likely to be either from Saunière himself or is a more modern addition. It could not have been a phenomenon before the early twentieth century unless Saunière merely rebuilt his church in the manner of its previous layout. This either dates the clue obtained from the parchment to after Saunière or the lights on the altar have been added to the church since by Saunière himself or afterwards in order to fit the clue in the parchment. This fact invalidates nothing however.


The parchment plain text talks about Jesus’ visit to Bethany immediately after the raising of Lazarus. Couple this with artifacts in the garden dedicated by Lazarists and it is a reasonable assumption that whatever it was that was providing an income for Saunière likely involved Lazarus and his ‘Born Again’ experiences coupled with astronomical phenomenon.

Perhaps it would be prudent to finish off this chapter with a discussion of the story of Lazarus and it is not without some controversy.


Only the Gospels of Luke and John speak of him by name and it seems that he suffered from Leprosy. As we know The Order of St Lazarus in Jerusalem was a military order believed to have been founded in around 1123CE and run by the Hospitaller brothers who established hospitals all over Europe to treat leprosy. In the book of Luke Lazarus was described as being in the Bosom of Abraham. In the book of Mark however there are two versions to the story owning to there being two versions of the book of Mark. Lazarus is not mentioned by name but in the secret Gospel of Mark reportedly owned by the Carpocratians[i19]  and repeated by Clement of Alexandria, ‘a certain woman’ approaches Jesus and tells him that her brother has died. As Jesus approaches the tomb he hears a loud cry for the within the tomb. Jesus rolls away the stone and raises the youth from the ground. It then says ‘And the youth looked upon him and loved and began to beseech him that he might be with him’. Together they go into a house, where Jesus and the young man remained for six days, “instructing the young man in the ways of the kingdom of heaven”. On the last day the two men spent a sleepless night together “naked with naked”.


The Cathar historian Antonin Gadal regards Lazarus as John the Beloved, the feminine looking disciple in many last supper paintings not just the Leonardo da Vinci fresco. Some writers have regarded these six days together are some kind of sexual rite, controversial to say the least, especially when you consider that the tradition insists they were both male. There does appear to good reason to regard Lazarus and John the Beloved as being one and the same person. Lazarus is Greek for Eliezer which is another name for Elijah or Elias. Many people thought that John the Baptist was Elijah/Elias reincarnated so by default Lazarus could indeed have been also given the title John.


The stained glass windows in Saunière’s church all deal with either Lazarus or the family of Lazarus; we are getting a pattern here. The theme seems to be resurrection coupled with the movement of the stars and planets. Remember that Philippe de Chérisey had said that he would leave things to the priests because they were more concerned with the sky and earth and astronomy and geography.


The Poussin’s shepherdess seems to be Ursa Major and/or Virgo and the Prieure de Sion seems to think so too, because they left us a clue right at the top of the Lobineau document.




The logo on the right is the astrological symbol for Virgo but the letters inset say OURS which is the French word for bear. The Bear (Ursa) is intertwined with Virgo


The two constellations Ursa Major and Minor are always seen in the northern sky, as explained later these can be associated with a celestial cross. The analogy of these two constellations to bears tends from their appearing the dance in a circle seemingly tethered to a pole (Polaris) like a dancing bear. Böotes is the great cultivator or Ploughman who drives the bears Ursa Major and Ursa Minor around the Pole Star Polaris. The bears dance around the pole pulling the plough behind them and tilling the heavenly fields and as Manilius in Astronomica said

“in order that the rotations of the heavens should never cease….they will be like kings and ministers of state, and be charged with the guardianship of the people, custodianship of great houses and treasures, who confine their business to the care of another’s home so that the wealth of monarchs and temple finances will be in their keeping”.


It seems also that the widow of a descendant of Girard de Roussillon (Duke of Burgundy), Beatrix was once described as ‘living like a bear in a cave’ after her husband’s death and Mary Magdalene ‘lived like a bear’ during her last days, the legend says. In the old chartreuse apparently frequented by Beatrix there was discovered in 1896 (at the start of Saunière’s building activities) a set of murals dating from the 14th century, one of which was a crucifixion which shows Jesus on a ‘green heart’ cross roughly trimmed in the same manner as the one shown with the weeping Mary Magdalene under the altar. Was this finding the inspiration for Saunière’s altar scene? Was this the discovery of a tomb that he mentioned in his diary?


Was Saunière involved with a sect that believes in resurrection on certain days of the year?


According to Claire Corbu and Antoine Captier, Saunière ordered the stained glass window from where the Blue Apples phenomenon occurs, from the House of Henri Feur at Bordeaux and he delivered his bill of 2478fr to Saunière in September 1887. You will of course immediately notice that this is prior to his enigmatic entries into his diary has to having found a tomb and the word Secret. Why did Saunière include (or repeat) this phenomena in his church and not make it public knowledge? The placing of the phrase ‘Blue Apples’ at the end of the decrypted text will prove significant and is straight out of alchemical practices of the 15th century.

 [I1]Born in St Malo, Brittany

 [I2]On the recommendation of Madame Récamier

 [I3]Incredibly built in a single year. Construction began in 1197 and was completed in 1198.

 [I4]This no longer survives

 [I5]Second wife of Henry IV of France and regent to the young Louis XIII who had become king following his father’s assassination.

 [I6]Written in letter form it was sent to Marie de Medici. The poem is straight out of Ovid and concerns a love affair between Venus and Adonis. 

 [I7]Real name Filippo Bruno

 [i8]There is another Cassini by the same name however here I use the Italian version of his name. Later I shall use the French version for the Cassini born in France.

 [i9]She liked to cross dress as a man and also went under the name of Count Dohna.

 [i10]Sword (L’Epee) in one hand and the scales Libra in the other.

 [I A11]Another researcher has noticed a remarkable coincidence with this. At Rennes les Bains there are three well known hot springs. One is the Strong Bath and is at 51º (LI) One is the ‘Queen’s Bath’ and is at 41º (XLI) and the other is the ‘Soft Bath’ and is at 40º (XL) and although this looks a little contrived the temperatures are a well known fact amongst the patrons of the Baths at Rennes les Bains and the numbers would indicate Rennes les Bains to someone with local knowledge. This may be a veiled reference to Rennes les Bains to the initiated but this would be obscure to anyone without a detailed local knowledge and so may be nothing more than an interesting coincidence.

 [i12]May be a Merovingian bee.

 [i13]Ovid Book the second: The story of Calisto

 [I A14]The Bear Goddess

 [i15]The different ways of classifying this constellation make it confusing. The Greeks knew it as Ophis Ophioukhou or simply Ophis and also they knew it as Erpeton and Egkhelus (eel) . Latins knew it as Anguilla, Anguis and Coluber but usually it was known as Serpens but often qualified as Serpens of Aesculapius, Caesius, Glaucus, Laocoon and Ophiuchus. Also Serpens Herculeus, Lernaeus and Sagarinus.

 [i16]In 1572 a very bright supernova appeared in Cassiopeia that was brighter than Venus and was visible in daytime for a year and a half. This was seen by the astronomer Tycho Brahe and he wrote about it in NOVA ET NVLLIVS. Today this rapidly expanding cloud is today merely identified as 3C 10 [i16].

 [i17]Right Ascension 17h 30m 42s Declination -21º 29’ 20000 light-years

 [i18]The name given to a new candidate for Master Mason

 [i19]A pagan Christian hybrid religion based on the cult of Isis.