Rose Croix Veritas

 Rennes le ChateauA French MysteryThe Holy GrailShugboroughMary MagdaleneFrench FreemasonryPoussinThe Rose LineThe debunkersLandscape Geometry    Zodiac de RennesTeniersGRAIL COUNTRYMegalith StudyGeometryPriory of SionSauniereDe Cherisey ConfessionRebuttal AnsweredInterviews17th JanuaryDossiers SecretLobineau DocumentLe Serpent RougeNoel CorbuThe London ConnectionLa Vraie Langue CeltiqueEt in Arcadia EgoThe Da Vinci Code    Henri BoudetParchment 1Parchment 2Otto RahnMartinistSaint MichaelTarotDa Vinci CodeLuciferGisorsRLC Treasures


MEGALITH STUDYCeltic Cross Mystery

DisclTHE FORUMaimer
Frontispiece from 1912 edition of The Protocols of Zion

The leading speculation regarding the Protocols is that the Russian Secret Police – The Ochrana, forged the Protocols in their entirety in order to impress Tzar Nicholas into agreeing to a persecution of the Jews in Russia and influence him into retaining Nilus as an advisor to Tzar Nicolas. This ‘theory’ fails to take into account the fact that at least part if not all of the text originated in France. The text even specifically criticises French journalism, why would the Russian Ochrana wish to criticise French journalism and not include Russian journalism as well? The most likely scenario is that a French lawyer called Maurice Joly wrote the groundwork for the Protocols of Zion. The title of Joly’s masterpiece from which the Protocols originated was called Dialogue aux anfers entre Machiaval et Montesquieu, ou la politique de Machiavel au XIX siècleDialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, or the politics of Machiavelli in the nineteenth Century. Joly was a subversive who was eventually thrown into jail for his activities; however the text he first published in Belgium in 1864 continued to be printed in secret presses. Joly had an intense hated of Napoleon III and probably had some instrumental effect in the Emperor’s eventual downfall. Nesta Webster makes a strong case for Joly as the source of the Protocols, in ‘Secret Societies and Subversive Movements’, she states:
"The Protocols were largely copied from the book Dialogues aux anfers entre Machiaval et Montesquieu published in 1864. Let it be said at once that the resemblance between the two works could not be accidental. Not only are whole paragraphs almost identical, but the various points in the programme following each other in precisely the same order."

Joly was tied to the Alliance Israelite Universelle through his association with French Rosicrucian Freemason in the French government Crémieux, Joly himself being a member of the ‘Antient(sic) Order of the Rosicrucians’ and had resurrected the ideals of Machiavelli in a warning forecast as to how the masses could be dominated. Interestingly the Protocols differ from Joly’s work inasmuch as Joly refers to ’We the Beast always says ‘We’ for he is Legion’. However General Rachkovsky, chief of the Ochrana did consider the Protocols as “excellent work” and had hoped that the Tsar would be impressed - he wasn’t.

This esoteric enclave of Papus and Monsieur Philippe was actively opposed by the Grand Duchess Elizabeth who was intent on installing her own favourites in proximity to the imperial throne. One of the grand duchess’s favourites was known under the pseudonym of Sergei Nilus a fluent French speaker and who was a rather contemptible anti-Semitic . Around 1903 Nilus presented the highly controversial document to the Tsar – The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion - a document that supposedly bore witness to a dangerous worldwide conspiracy. But if Nilus expected the Tsar’s gratitude for his disclosure, he must have been grievously disappointed. The Tsar declared the document to be an outrageous fabrication, and ordered all copies of it to be destroyed and Nilus was banished from the court in disgrace.

Standing completely in antithesis of Jewish ideals the Protocols of Zion referred to king, a pope, an international church, and to Sion and was signed by the ‘representatives of the Sion of the 33rd Degree’ (a direct reference to the Scottish Rite Freemasonry of Albert Pike whose Southern US headquarters he help found on the 33 degree parallel in Charleston, SC). The Protocols speaks openly of infiltrating freemasonry and using its members for its own purposes as did the Compagne de Saint-Sacrement.

Post WWII seekers of the truth have a serious problem. At the mere mention of the previously described document given the name Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion one is instantly labeled Anti-Semitic for even daring to mention the name. The fact is that this document was regarded in the twisted, bitter mind of Hitler and his followers as some kind proof of a Jewish conspiracy and so anyone daring to do no more than read and discuss this document must be clearly in league with the Nazis using the corrupted logic of other twisted and bitter souls that the mere mention of something automatically implies complicity with it. So one is never allowed to study what could well be a pointer to the grave dangers we are facing in the early 21st century, a trend which in itself should ring alarm bells. It’s the same as observing a large asteroid heading for earth but because the first observation was reported in a disenfranchised journal then one should never be allowed to discuss it until it blows the earth apart. In fact the protocols themselves say in its 24 chapters that one is encouraged to foster the illusion of an Anti-Semitic attitude amongst anyone trying to investigate the activities of these “Elders of Zion”. To call the Protocols a fake or a hoax is an oversimplification; for one thing patterns of events that have happened and are happening now are written down in this document, but to declare them as wholly the truth is also an oversimplification. Let us look at their history in order to explain this apparent dichotomy.

In 1797 the French Jesuit Abbé Barruel who wrote a five volume Memoire pou server á l’histore du Jacobinisme, behind the Jacobins he saw a conspiracy of three secret societies: the Order of Templars, the Order of Freemasons and the Illuminati (none of these specifically Jewish in nature). In 1806 he received a copy of a letter  from J.B. Simonini, an army officer in Florence. In this letter was the statement that the Jews ‘promised themselves that in less than a century, they would be masters of the world’. This letter was circulated widely in France however it was later revealed that it had been fabricated by the French Police in order to turn Napoleon against the Jews (the fabrication of the letter may well be genuine). Later in 1848 Hermann Goedsche, a German Postal official forged papers indicating a conspiracy to assassinate the King of Prussia. After being found out he was removed from his job but he began writing under the name of Sir John Retcliffe and in one of his novels called Biarritz there was a chapter called ‘In the Jewish cemetery in Prague’ in which the twelve tribes of Israel met with Satan to tell him the plans to control the world. In this book of fiction the proceedings were witnessed by two men who then dedicated their lives to fighting this so-called ‘Jewish Plot’. In 1872, Russian anti-Semites picked up this chapter and printed this chapter in a pamphlet as “fiction based on fact”. It was reprinted in 1876 and 1880 and in 1881 the story was published in the French paper Le Contemporain as fact and all of the individual speeches made by each tribe were consolidated into a single speech, supposedly made by a chief Rabbi in a secret meeting of influential Jews. The claim was made to have come from a forthcoming book by English diplomat, Sir John Readcliffe (clearly taken off Goedsche’s pen-name) in order to give the story some substance. In 1891 the story reappeared in a Russian newspaper Novorosssiysky Telegraf which said that the speech was made by a rabbi to a secret Sanhedrin (possibly referring to the First Congress of Reformed Judaism held in Leipzig). The article was again attributed to this Sir John Readcliffe. Later in 1920 another French newspaper La Vielle France said that The Protocols of Zion bore a striking resemblance to something that a Rabbi Reichhorn had said in Prague in 1869 over the tomb of Grand Rabbi Simoen-ben-Ihuda. This apparently fictional speech was used in 1900 to instigate a pogrom against the Jews and became universally known as ‘The Rabbi’s Speech’. A known anti-Semite called P.A. Khrushevan used the speech to provoke this pogrom at Kishinev in the Ukraine in 1903 in which 45 Jews were killed and 400 injured and 1300 Jewish homes and shops were destroyed. The speech, which we know was originally a work of fiction, was now being used to prove the authenticity of the Protocols. Nilus showed these to the Czar in 1903, who being a freemason himself, believed them to be fraudulent, and ordered that all copies were to be destroyed. After this Nilus was banned from the Court, it is believed that he may have altered the text to be more intense than they originally were. However, as far as the mysterious references to the “representatives of Sion, of the 33rd degree,” he would not have any idea what this meant, and probably would not have altered this and any other in-kind references. Note that this "Rabbis Speech" in the cemetery in Prague is merely smoke and mirrors and is a switch and sell attempt to further discredit the Protocols which on the face of it have nothing to do with Goedsche's novel Biarritz, a clear work of fiction.

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion as we know it in it’s final draft first appeared, in August, 1903 edition of the Kishinev newspaper, in the Ukraine and then again in 1905, in the appendix of the third edition of a book by Nilus called The Great in the Small, which was a treatise about the coming of the Antichrist. Nilus said that the Protocols were translated from the French text of a speech made to 300 influential Jews. According to the story a prostitute had allegedly stole the document from a leading Jew.

A copy was received by the British Museum in London, in August, 1906, where it was translated by English journalist Victor Marsden, who published it in 1921. Marsden said that he couldn’t work on the translation for more than an hour at a time, because of the evil he felt while reading it. In 1917, Nilus revised and expanded his book, which he called; He is Near, At the Door: Here Comes the Antichrist and the Reign of the Devil on Earth. Nilus wrote:

“These Protocols are nothing else than a strategic plan for the conquest of the world ... presented to the Council of the Elders by ... Theodor Herzl, at the time of the first Zionist Congress (held by the World Zionist Organization in 1897, at Basel, Switzerland).”

However, in his 1905 edition, he said that the Protocols had been given in 1902-03. In fact, with each subsequent edition that appeared in different countries, the origin of the document was different.

On August 16, 17, and 18, 1921, the New York Times ran editorials by Phillip Graves, a London Times correspondent, who said that the Protocols had been copied from a rare 1864 French political satire called Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (also referred to as the Dialogues of Geneva by the London Times because Geneva had been identified as a centre of revolutionary activities) by lawyer Maurice Joly (1831-1878). It was a pamphlet containing a conversation between Montesquieu (presenting a case for liberalism) and Machiavelli (who represented autocracy) which criticized the government of Napoleon III (who was deposed in 1871). Being illegal to criticize the Monarchy, he fictionalised it, making Napoleon the character of Machiavelli, to explain the Emperor’s underlying motives. Joly had it printed in Belgium, then attempted to have it smuggled over the French border. It was seized by the police, who confiscated as many copies as they could, then banned the book. The police traced the book to Joly, who was then tried on April 25, 1865, and sentenced to fifteen months in prison. At the Berne trials, a witness for the prosecution tried to prove that Joly was a Jew, and that his book was a coded version of the Jewish plan for world domination. Victor Hugo (1802-1885), listed as a Grand Master of the Prieuré de Sion(1844-1885) as previously reported who in 1849 made a reference to the ‘United States of Europe,’ wrote satirical poetry against Napoleon III. It is likely that Joly knew Victor Hugo.

As it turns out, over 160 passages from the Protocols are almost a word for word copy of Joly’s book, which is about half the text of Joly’s original and the only major change is that it was altered from the past, to the future.

Some researchers believe that either, Joly was given the minutes to a Masonic meeting by Adolphe Crémieux (a Mason and Rosicrucian), who urged Joly to write the book, which he did under the pseudonym of “Mr. X”; or that the minutes were from a Marxist meeting which took place in a Masonic lodge in Geneva, and had been stored in the archives of the Mizraim Masonic Lodge in Paris, where Crémieux, who sat on the Supreme Council, discovered them.

Who could have forged the Protocols isn’t known, if in fact it is a forgery. Some researchers claim it was done in Russia, in 1904, by agents of the Tzar. However, the general consensus is that it was probably done by Elie de Cyon (Ilya Tsion), a Russian journalist living in Paris, who was an opponent of Sergey Witte, the Russian Minister of Finance.

When Witte took office in 1892, he began to modernize Russia by doubling steel, iron, and coal production; and constructing railroads. He was disliked by those who had their money tied up in agriculture. He caused inflation by abandoning the gold standard in 1898 because of an economic slump. The Protocols say that such economic depressions are caused by the Elders to gain control of the money; and that the gold standard has ruined every country that has adopted it. Researchers say that the economic and financial data could have been extracted from Joly’s book, and applied to Witte, in order to present him as a tool of the Elders of Zion.

So it was Elie de Cyon who allegedly forged and translated the Protocols, expanding them as an apparent satire on Witte. His writings resembled the style used in the Protocols; and he was known to have used another French satire on a dead statesman, by changing the names.

In 1897, Gen. Pyotr Ivanovich Rachkovsky, head of the Russian Secret Police in Paris, on instructions from Witte, broke into Cyon’s villa at Territet, Switzerland, to look for additional written attacks on Witte. It is believed that Rachkovsky discovered the Protocols there, and used it for a dual purpose. He could use it against the Jews, claiming it was part of a Jewish conspiracy; and he could reveal that it was written by a Jew, which Cyon was, thus destroying Cyon. It was kind of ironic, that the Russian translation for Cyon’s name, ‘Tsion’, also means ‘Zion.’ So his name was Elie of Sion. Territet is on the banks of Lake Geneva a district of Montreux and is a short boat ride from where the Prieure de Sion was first formed.

In 1921, Count Alexandru du Chayla said that Nilus revealed to him in 1909 that the Protocols were fraudulent, and had been sent to him by Gen. Rachkovsky.

During the 1934 trial of two Swiss Nazis in Berne, brought by a group of Jews who accused them of distributing the Protocols, the historian Vladimir Burtsev and a professor, Sergey Svatikov, testified that Rachkovsky and other Tzarist officials had a hand in the fabrication of the Protocols. In 1891, Rachkovsky sent a letter to the Police, and announced his intentions to oppose the Jews. This was followed up by a book that stated his views about the Jews, and how, as a result of the French Revolution, they controlled Europe. It is quite possible that he added to Cyon’s original manuscript to produce the Protocols, and then gave it to Sergei Nilus to publish in his book. On May 14, 1935, the Court of Berne ruled regarding the Protocols (and contrary to popular belief):

“that this court did not declare the Protocols fake but were merely not of Jewish origin.”

To complicate matters even more, a book by Jacob Venedey, called Machiavelli: Montesquieu and Rousseau, which was published in Berlin, in 1850, also contained passages very similar and in the same order to the Protocols.

Standard Oil allegedly had the Protocols distributed in Russia to create a tense situation between the Czarist Russian government, and the Jewish-owned Royal Dutch Co., who had oil distribution rights in Russia. The document was also used in the late 1800’s to instigate pogroms against the Jews so they would migrate to the United States. Once they were in America, they were registered to vote Democratic, and greatly contributed to Wilson’s election in 1912. During the Russian Civil War from 1918-20, Bolsheviks distributed the Protocols, and in the subsequent pogroms, over 100,000 Jews were killed. During World War II, the document gave Hitler an excuse to exterminate the Jews, and there is evidence which indicates that he was financed and controlled by the Illuminati.

Eventually the Protocols were distributed all over the world, and it gave the anti-Semitic people of various countries an excuse to persecute the Jews. In 1920, U.S. industrialist Henry Ford supported them in a series of articles in his newspaper The Dearborn Independent and eventually in his book The International Jew, which he published in 1921. On February 17, 1921, in New York World, Ford said: “The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.” The German translation was known as The Eternal Jew. Ford supported Hitler, who was seen by him as fighting against the international Jewish conspiracy. In 1927, he renounced his belief in them after his car was sideswiped, forcing it over a steep embankment. He interpreted this as an attempt on his life by elitist Jews.

In 1938, Father Charles E. Coughlin printed them in his weekly paper Social Justice, and various other semi-religious organizations followed suit.

Those researchers who believe in the authenticity of the Protocols, trace them back to 1785, when the Illuminati courier was struck by lightning on the way to Paris, and their plans for world control was discovered. The Illuminati had drafted a master plan that was worded in such a way, that it diverted attention away from the Illuminati, and directed it towards the Jewish Revolutionary movement in Russia. Their plan would appear to be a Jewish plot to achieve world control through political Zionism, when in fact it represented the future plans of the international bankers of the Illuminati. The fact that the document was anti-Semitic would help suppress it.

One inescapable fact is that the Protocols do reflect some of the views of Weishaupt, the founder of the quasi-Masonic Illuminati on May 1st 1776 and also the writings of various Socialists on Bolshevism; and because of that, they were not easily dismissed. Even though they were written so long ago, they have become an accurate barometer of events during this century and the last, and seem to parallel the goals of the Illuminati, as you can see in these excerpts from the Victor Marsden translation:

“Out of the temporary evil we are now compelled to commit, will emerge the good of an unshakable rule, which will restore the regular course of the machinery of the national life, brought to naught by liberalism. The result justifies the means. Let us, however, in our plans, direct our attention not to what is good and moral, as to what is necessary and useful. Our power in the present tottering condition of all forms of power will be more invisible than any other, because it will remain invisible until the moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning can any longer undermine it. Before us is a plan in which is laid down strategically the line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labour of many centuries brought to naught...”

“Only force conquers in political affairs, especially if it be concealed in the talents essential to statesmen ... This evil is the one and only means to attain the end, the good. Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit, and treachery, when they should serve towards the attainment of our end. In politics one must know how to seize the property of others without hesitation if by it we secure submission and sovereignty.”

So the Protocols were (and still are) seen by the uninformed as evidence of a Jewish conspiracy and used by anti-Semitic elements to gain their own subversive ends. However when one reads the text themselves there is little evidence to substantiate a specific essentially Jewish plot. Apart from the liberal use of the word Goyim which is the Jewish name for those who aren’t Jewish, the Protocols seem to be more Masonic than Jewish. The signature at the bottom is distinctly odd if one is attempting to discredit the Jews and the Jews only. It says:

“Signed by the representatives of Sion of 33rd degree”.

It talks of Popes not Chief Rabbis and churches not synagogues and it also refers to the Davidic Bloodline and the coming of the King of the Jews, a title once held by Jesus. Since when has modern Judaism been concerned with Royalty or Popes? This King of the Jews will be selected by the “three who hold sponsor to him” - hardly Jewish, more Masonic and specifically a branch of freemasonry that concerns itself with 33 degrees. If this is a fake document to discredit the Jews it is decidedly ham-fisted and written by someone who has little or no knowledge of Judaism.

But it isn’t from ordinary freemasons either: “Freemasons "have to die at the hands of the revolution which has been brought about with their cooperation” according to C.G. Rachkovsky, a founder of the Communist International. "The real secret of masonry is the suicide of Freemasonry as an organization, and the physical suicide of every important mason." This disclosure is from a 1938 Stalinist police interrogation entitled "The Red Symphony." (Transcript in Des Griffin, Fourth Reich of the Rich, p. 254) "It is clear that I know of this not as a Freemason, but as one who belongs to 'Them,'" [meaning the Illuminati] says Rachkovsky who had been a colleague of Leon Trotsky who was arrested for plotting against Stalin. Rachkovsky's aim was to convince Stalin, a nationalist, to cooperate with the "the Communist-Capitalist International". Freemasonry is the world's largest secret society with over five million members, including three million in the US. It is instrumental in the totalitarian conspiracy. In The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the author writes,

"Gentile masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects, but
the plan of action of our force, even its very abiding place, remains for
the whole people an unknown mystery....Who and what is in a position to
overthrow an invisible force?" (Protocol 4)

The Protocols says

"We shall create and multiply free Masonic lodges...
absorb into them all who may become or who are prominent in public
activity, for in these lodges we shall find our principle intelligence
office and means of influence.... The most secret political plots will be
known to us and will fall under our guiding hands...We know the final
goal...whereas the goyim have knowledge of nothing..." (Protocol 15)

In his interrogation, Rachkovsky said that millions flock to Freemasonry to gain an advantage. He says that the rulers of all the Allied nations were Freemasons, with very few exceptions. He says that the real aim is to create all the required prerequisites for the triumph of the Communist revolution; this is the obvious aim of Freemasonry; it is clear that all this is done under various pretexts; but they always conceal themselves behind their well known treble slogan [Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity]. You understand? Masons should recall the lesson of the French Revolution. Although they played a colossal revolutionary role; it consumed the majority of masons..."Since the revolution requires the extermination of the bourgeoisie as a class, [so all wealth will be held by the Illuminati in the guise of the State] it follows that Freemasons must be liquidated. The true meaning of Communism is Illuminati tyranny. When this secret is revealed, the expression of stupidity on the face of some Freemason when he realises that he must die at the hands of the revolutionaries. How he screams and wants that one should value his services to the revolution! It is a sight at which one can die...but of laughter!" Rachkovsky refers to Freemasonry as a hoax: "a madhouse at liberty." When the interrogator pressed Rachkovsky for Illuminati notables to approach with an initiative, Rachkovsky was only sure of two who were deceased: Walter Rathenau, the Weimar foreign minister, and Lionel Rothschild. He says that Leon Trotsky was his source of this information.

A 1936 issue of the Palestine Post (now the Jerusalem Post) had a small article about a lobbying campaign focused on - Palestine Solidarity Review the German state that the German Zionist Federation be recognized as “the only instrument for the exclusive control of German Jewish life.” We might see this as a transition in this survey between the logic of fascist ambitions among some Zionists and the idea that they should be the authoritative Jewish community leaders under ethnic pluralism endorsed by
the state. This could be any state, for example America or Britain.
Brenner’s interview with Joachim Prinz, future head of the American Jewish Congress, shows Zionists accepted racial segregation under the Nazis. Negotiations with the Nazis were possible, and since they were uncertain of Jewish existence (that is to be treated as human beings, outside the existence of a Jewish state) he thought it was possible for
group conscious Zionists to be given autonomy under the Nazi state. Mr. Prinz we learn is part of that great amorphous American rainbow coalition which marched with Dr. Martin Luther King.

Extract from 51 documents Zionist collaboration with the Nazis"


Lenni Brenner

Extract from Occult Theocrasy
by Edith Starr Miller
Lady Queenborough

Some years ago, a document to which the readermust be referred, The Protocols of the Wise Men or Elders of Zion 2, was brought to light. Abstracted from a Jewish Lodge of Mizraim in Paris, in 1884, by Joseph Schorst, later murdered in Egypt, it embodied the programme of esoteric Judaism. Schorst was the son of a man who, in 1881, had been sentenced in London to ten years penal servitude for counterfeiting. Before studying these Protocols however, the reader should be made acquainted with a few facts. This document was first published in 1905 at Tsarskoe Selo (Russia), embodied in a book called The Great Within the Small written by Sergius A. Nilus. In January 1917, a second edition, revised and documented, was ready, but before it could be put on the market for distribution and sale, the revolution had taken place (March 1917), and the Provisional Government had been replaced by that of Kerensky who himself gave the order to have the whole edition of S. A. Nilus's book destroyed. It was burnt. A few copies however had been distributed, one of them found its way to England, one to Germany and one again to the United States of America in 1919.
In each of these three countries, a few people determined to make a close study of the document with the result that it was soon published everywhere. In England, it was and still is published by an organization called " The Britons ". In Germany, a remarkable work was done by Gottfried zum Beck. In France, it was published by Mgr. Jouin of the Revue Internationale des Societes Secretes and by the fearless M. Urbain Gohier of Vieille France. In the United States, two anonymous editions were published, one by Small Maynard of Boston, and the other, later, by the Beckwith Company.
Then editions appeared in Italian, Russian, Arabic and even Japanese. No sooner had the document been made public than loud protests were heard coming from all sections of dispersed Israel. Writers and lecturers were recruited to deny the assertion and shatter the growing belief of a Jewish conspiracy for the political, economic and legislative dominion of the world .

The method of intimidation used to suppress discussion of The Protocols has always been the same. It consists in suggesting that the person guilty of interest in the subject is crazy or becoming so. As the average mortal prefers to be thought sane by his fellow men, the trick generally works. A short review of the affray must be made. First and foremost came a strong denial made by a Jew, Lucien Wolf, who wrote the pamphlet : The Jewish Bogey and the Forged Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, (1920). Israel Zangwill, another Jew, also wrote against the veracity of the Protocols. Then, in America, followed articles by William Hard, in the Metropolitan, ridiculing belief in the document. More serious was the painstaking campaign undertaken against the publication of the Protocols by the chiefs of the U. S. Kahal or Kehillah, who intimidated the editor, George H. Putnam, and. forced him to stop the publication of the book by threats to call his loans and thus ruin him financially. The Beckwith Co. was eventually induced by the Jewish Anti-Defamation League to enclose in every copy of the edition they published a small pamphlet containing the denial of the contents of the Protocols. Among the Gentiles found ready to deny the truth of the Protocols was a certain du Chayla, also a Mrs. Hurlbut and the notorious Princess Catherine Radziwill who had previously reached the pinnacle of self-advertisement by having had herself sentenced to a term of imprisonment in South Africa for forgery in 1902. It seemed as if all the denials against the Jewish authorship of the Protocols had been made, when finally in 1921 the London Times made the sensational discovery through one of its correspondents in Constantinople, a Mr. X. — of a French book which they called the Dialogues of Geneva, published anonymously at Brussels in 1865. It was this book, the Times affirmed, which had been plagiarized by the author of the Protocols. The publication of this discovery by the Times seemed to have closed all further discussion tending to prove the Jewish authenticity of the Protocols and very little has been heard since on the subject.

Yet, to use the words of the Zionist,
Max Nordau, during his violent quarrel with another Zionist, Asher Ginsberg : Audealur et altera pars. It is this other side of the story which the reader is now asked to hear. The book The Times called The Geneva Dialogues bears in reality the following title : Dialogues aux Enfers entre Machiavelli et Montesquieu. It had been published anonymously in Brussels in 1864. The introduction ends thus : " Geneva, October 13, 1865 ". It was soon discovered by the police of Napoleon III that the author of the book was a certain lawyer, Maurice Joly, who was arrested, tried, and sentenced
to two years' imprisonment (April 1865), as it was averred that he had written his book as an attack against the government of Napoleon III to which he had lent all the Machiavelian plans revealed in the Dialogues. A short sketch of the author's life is necessary in order to understand the spirit of his book. Maurice Joly (1831-1878), was born at His mother, nee Florentine Corbara Courtois, was a Corsican of Italian origin and a Roman Catholic. Her father, Laurent Courtois, had been paymaster-general of Corsica. He had an inveterate hatred of Napoleon I. Joly's father was Philipe Lambert Joly, born at Dieppe, Normandy. He had a comfortable fortune and had been attorney general for the department of Jura for a period of 10 years under Louis Philippe. Maurice Joly was educated at Dijon and began his law studies there, but in 1849 he left for Paris. There, thanks to his maternal grandfather's masonic associations, he secured, just before the Coup d'Etat in 1851, a post in the Ministry of the Interior under M. Chevreau. In 1860 only, he terminated his law studies, — he wrote several articles, showed a certain amount of talent and ended by founding apaper called Le Palais for lawyers and attorneys. The principal stockholders were Jules Favre, Desmaret, Leblond, Adolphe Crémieux, Arago, and Berryer. Joly was a Socialist. He wrote of himself:

" Socialism seems to me one of the forms of a new life for the peoples emancipated from the traditions of the Old World. I accept a great many of the solutions offered by Socialism but I reject Communism either as a social factor or as a political institution. Communism is but a school of Socialism. In politics I understand extreme means to gain one's ends — in that, at least, I am a Jacobin. "

Friend of Adolphe Cremieux, he shared in his hatred of Napoleon III. He hated absolutism as much as he hated Communism and as, under the influence of his Prime Minister Rouher, the French Emperor led a policy of reaction, Maurice Joly qualified it as Machiavelian and depicted it as such in his pamphlet. In one of his books he wrote of it :

" Machiavelli represents the policy of Might compared to Montesquieu's, which represents the policy of Right — Machiavelli will be Napoleon III who will himself depict his abominable policy ".

From Maurice Joly — Son passe, son programme — by himself, 1870). And here comes the important point which the Times omitted to put before its readers when it made the sensational discovery about the Dialogues of Geneva in 1921! Maurice Joly, who hated Communism and, in 1864, ascribed the Machiavelian policy of Might over Right to the Imperialism of Napoleon III, was evidently ignorant of the fact that he himself was no innovator, for, long before he ever entered the journalistic or political world, the very theory which he had tried to expose and refute had been the guiding principle of a group of ardent revolutionists, promoters of Communism, and worthy followers of Illuminatis and Babouvists, the group of Karl Marx, Jacoby, etc. the agitators of the 1848 revolution.
Long before Maurice Joly's book Dialogues aux Enfers entre Machiavelli et Montesquieu had made its appearance, another book bearing much the same title had been published in Berlin in 1850. It was called
Machiavelli, Montesquieu, Rousseau by Jacob Venedy and was published by Franz Dunnicker, Berlin. 3 Jacob Venedy, the author, was a Jew, born in Cologne, May 1805, died February 1871. Owing to his revolutionary activities, he was expelled from Germany and sought refuge in France. "While living in Paris, in 1835, he edited a paper of subversive character called Le Proscrit
which caused the police to send him away from Paris. He then lived at Le Hâvre. Later, due to the intercession of Arago and Mignet, friends of Adolphe Crémieux, he was once more allowed to return to Paris. Meanwhile, he had published a book, Romanisme, Christianisme et Germanisme, which had won for him the praise of the French Academy. Venedy was a close friend and associate of Karl Marx. He had spent the years 1843-44 in England which at that time was the refuge and abode of all the master minds of the 1848 revolution. In 1847 Venedy was in Brussels with Karl Marx who had founded there the secret organization called " The Communist League of Workers ", which was eventually brought out into the open under the name of " The International Society of Democracy "
(Societe Internationale de la Democratic). In 1848, after the February Revolution, Venedy returned to Germany, still in the company of Karl Marx. He soon afterwards became one of the chiefs of the revolutionary Committee of Fifty, organized at Frankfort-on-Main in March 1848. Venedy was sent as " Commissar " into the Oberland to stand against Ecker. In Hesse-Homburg he was elected a member of the Left and took his place in the Committee of Fifty. It was at this time that in Berlin he published his book Machiavelli, Montesquieu and Rousseau, upholding the ideas of Machiavelli and Rousseau for the slavery and demoralization of the people. When order was once more re-established in Germany, Venedy was expelled from Berlin and Breslau. He was an active member of the Masonic Order Bauhlitte which was affiliated to the Carbonari. (See Die Bauhlütte for Feb. 25, 1871).

It is to be regretted that the Times, which had started an investigation to trace the authorship of The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion, and lift it off the shoulders of Jewry upon which it rested, should have missed looking into the literary and revolutionary activities of Jacob Venedy. Following the apparent contradiction between Jacob Venedy and Maurice Joly, one showing the Machiavelli and Rousseau policy as that of triumphant Communism, whilst the other makes it the policy of Reaction and Imperialism, one is apt to overlook the link between the two. The student of the 1830-1848 period of history is here confronted by a remarkable fact. Fould, the Rothschilds of Paris, London and Vienna, Montefiore, Disraeli, the Goldsmids, were not less Jews than Karl Marx, Moses Hess, Jacoby, Lassalle, Venedy, Riesser. The Liberal Conservatism of Disraeli, the reactionary Imperialism of Fould and the revolutionary Communism of Karl Marx all point towards the same aim, namely, the establishment of Jewish power, whether under a Constitutional Monarchy, an Empire, or a Republic. And although their respective activities seem to stand so far apart, yet they are all linked, all tending towards the same end. One of the most striking instances is the case of Adolphe Crémieux who played a prominent part in the period we are now concerned with, and who was connected with all parties and actually helped form the centre which united them all, viz. The ALLIANCE ISRAELITE UNIVERSELLE, which was, in fact, the central Kahal for Universal Jewry. The life of Adolphe Crémieux and the activities of his Jewish contemporaries, belonging to widely divergent social spheres, illustrate forcibly the concerted plan of Judaism to reach its secret Messianic hope of world domination. Until about 1848, it seemed somewhat difficult to show conclusively the link between Judaism and Illuminism, Communism and Capitalism, but a close study of the life of Adolphe Crémieux, and that of his confidential agent, Leon Gambetta, throws full light on the subject. Whereas in Gentile life, there is an unbridgeable abyss between Conservatism and Anarchy, Religion and Atheism, there is no such chasm in the Jewish mentality. There, all currents, no matter in what direction they may seem to flow, are finally united and channelled in one unique direction. If it has been somewhat difficult for historians of the French Revolution to see the close link between Judaism and Illuminism, we repeat that no such difficulty exists for the student of the 1848 revolutionary period, after he has followed the life of Adolphe Crémieux and the activities of his Jewish contemporaries. The main difference is that the term " Illuminism " used in the 18th century is replaced by the wide term
Freemasonry which embraces all the existent secret societies. Adolphe Isaac Crémieux (1796-1880) came from a Jewish family of the South of France, that had members in Aix, Nîmes and Marseilles. 4 In his youth, Crémieux was an enthusiastic admirer of Napoleon I ; yet in 1831, he pronounces the funeral eulogy of the ill famed revolutionist of 1789, the Abbe Gregoire. He chose law as his profession and was admitted to the Bar at Nimes in 1817. Briefly, Crémieux life may be viewed from three sides : 1st, his racial Jewish activities, 2nd, his Masonic activities, 3rd, his political influence.
Crémieux's racial Jewish activities are exemplified by the part he took in the
Damascus Affair with Moses Montefiore, a Jew of England, when Jewry successfully but unconvincingly silenced the accusation of ritual murder committed upon the Catholic priest, Father Thomas, at Damascus, in 1840. He had a prominent share in the foundation and development of the Alliance Israelite Universelle.

Officially founded in 1860, this international union of disseminated Jewry had, as we know, existed for centuries, but after the Damascus affair, the Jewish leaders knew that they had attained sufficient power to feel enabled to show to the whole world that although the civil rights they enjoyed had been granted them by different countries, the real allegiance of each and every one of them was due to their Jewish nationality. The Masonic activities of Adolphe Crémieux were many and powerful. His connection with Louis Bonaparte and his brother, who both were affiliated to the Carbonari, would suggest that he was also connected with this secret society. But it is a fact that Crémieux belonged to the Lodge of Mizraim, the Scottish Rite, and also the Grand Orient. He was in the Supreme
Council of the Order of Mizraim and, at the death of Viennet, in whose person the Grand Orient and the Scottish Rite had been united, Crémieux succeeded him as Grand Master. The political activities of Crémieux are also manifold and varied. In his youth, he had been an admirer of Napoleon I and later became an intimate friend as well as the legal adviser of the Bonaparte family and joined their party which was undermining the government of Louis Philippe, son of Philippe " Egalite " In 1848, he was one of the most ardent supporters of Louis Napoleon and took an active part in the overthrow of Louis Philippe. He had been one of the foremost speakers in the association known as the Campagne des Banquets which had done so much to promote the Revolution of Feb. 1848. He became a member of the provisional government and was appointed Minister of Justice. He strongly advocated the candidature of his friend, Louis Napoleon, for the post of President of the French Republic. Crémieux had had hopes of being made Chief Executive under Louis Napoleon and thus play in France the same role which Disraeli played in England, that is ruling the country from behind the scenes. Both Disraeli and Crémieux had the same financial backing, namely the wealth of the Rothschilds and Montefiores who, in London, were friends of Disraeli and, in Paris, friends of Crémieux. Crémieux was therefore keenly disappointed when General Cavaignac was appointed Prime Minister in the Republican Government of Louis Napoleon, and as a revenge, he directed his activities against the Prince President, his former friend. He became so hostile to him, that in 1851, after the Coup d'Etat of December 2, by which Louis Napoleon recreated the Empire and assumed the title of Napoleon III, Crémieux was imprisoned at Vincennes and Mazas. After his release, he made himself the champion and defender of the Communist associates of Karl Marx, the revolutionaries Louis Blanc, Ledru Rollin, Pierre Leroux and others. His untiring efforts were directed against the Empire in general and Napoleon III in particular, and he consorted with all the Emperor's enemies, among them, Maurice Joly, the author of the Dialogue between Machiavelli and Montesquieu. After the overthrow of Napoleon III and the defeat of France at the hands of Germany in 1871, and the establishment of the Republic, Crémieux once more took an open part in the political affairs of the country. He pushed to the front his former secretary Gambetta and effectively directed him in his shady negotiations with Bismarck, the latter himself being guided by the Jew Bamberger (1852-1899), a former revolutionist of 1848, but who, having found refuge in France, had been for many years manager in Paris of the Jewish Bank Bischoffsheim and Goldschmidt. He was one of Crémieux's friends, and the war could not affect the ties linking the Jews united in the Alliance Israelite Universelle. From 1871 until his death, it can be safely asserted that Crémieux as President of the Alliance Israelite Universelle and Grand Master of the Scottish Rite. exercised a tremendous influence upon the anti-religious campaign which followed the Franco-Prussian War. In this as in all his lifelong activities, Crémieux was only obeying the teachings of the Talmud and trying to destroy every religion but that contained in Judaism. His favourite theme was that there should be only one cult — and that cult should be Jewish. At a general assembly of the Alliance Israelite Universelle, on May 31 1864, Crémieux had said : " The Alliance is not limited to our cult, it voices its appeal to all cults and wants to penetrate in all the religions as it has penetrated into all countries. Let us endeavour boldly to bring about the union of all cults under one flag of Union and Progress. Such is the slogan of humanity.

One cult, one flag ! Are the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion or the speeches of Machiavelli in Joly's book anything but a lengthy exposition of the ideas briefly expressed by Crémieux ? His activities are one of the clearest examples of Jewish internationalism and Jewish efforts for the realization of the Messianic ideal. The Alliance Israelite Universelle issued from the Rite of Mizraim plus Universal Freemasonry, subsidized by International Finance, would spell the doom of Christian civilization, the destruction of nationalism, the death of nations upon whose ruin has been erected a new Temple of Solomon, containing the treasures and material wealth of the whole world, and over which is placed the six pointed star of ZIONISM.

Edith Starr Miller, an American socialite, was the estranged wife of Almeric Hugh PAGET, Lord Queenborough. Treasurer of the League of Nations and member of the British Fascist Society
She died under suspicious circumstances in Paris in 1933.
Note the police investigation into the death of Princess Diana, another socialite who married into aristocracy and who also died in Paris in suspicious circumstances, was called Operation PAGET.



The Jewish Cemetery in Prague and the Council of Representatives of the Twelve Tribes of Israel," as described in the book of fiction written by Hermann Goedsche



The highly remarkable book "Waters Flowing Eastward"/a> by L. Fry contains much valuable information regarding Maurice Joly (Moses Joel). In the "Memoirs of Rene Mareuil," (one of the members of the Ministerial Cabinet of Polignac of France) is stated that Maurice Joly was born in 1831 and was employed in 1848 in the ministry at Chebreau as a minor employee. The young man was strongly influenced by Adolph Israel Cremieux (the founder of the Alliance Israelite Universelle.) Later he became a communist and was jailed for two years. In 1878 he committed suicide and at his burial the Jew Gambetta (former prime minister of France) delivered a post-mortem speech.

It should be remembered that Gambetta played a certain part in the French commune, that Bolshevik reign of terror that existed in France from March 18th to May 29th, 1871, during which time Paris was robbed and ruined. Nevertheless, by a most remarkable "coincidence none of the 145 houses owned by Alphonse Rothschild were damaged.

What are the conclusions that can be drawn from the foregoing information? They are:

1. The Jewish author that furnished the inspiration for the "Protocols" did not confine himself to nefarious theories; he did not hesitate to apply them practically in criminal actions.

2. The "Protocols" have nothing whatsoever' to do with the Russian Secret police, as the "Corrrespondent" of the "Times" infers.

3. The "Dialogues" are not a creation of an anti-semite, but on the contrary they represent the Quintessence of Jewish Idealism.

4. The satanical development of ideas of this book is extracted from a still older work, thus proving Joly to be a plagiarist himself.

"The Dialogues Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu" is the title of this older book, published by Franz Duncker at Berlin in 1850. The author of this book was the Jew Jacob Venedey. He was born in 1805 in Cologne, Germany; expelled from Germany he settled in Paris in 1835... Prosecuted by the police for his subversive activities, he was protected and defended (as was the case with Joly) by Cremieux. Venedey was an intimate friend of Karl Marx (alias Jew Mordechai).

With Marx's assistance he organized in 1847 "The Communist Workers League. In 1843 he visited England and organized another secret society having as a purpose the promotion of Israel's World Domination.

Thus it is definitely proved that both books that served as a foundation for the "Protocols," were written by Jews, both of whom were friend of the founder of the "Alliance Israelite Universelle," ADOLPH ISRAEL CREMIEUX.

Under these circumstances it can not be doubted that all three books are the product of Jewish thought.

Anyone who will study carefully these books should be very much surprised to hear the Jews whining about Jews being innocently persecuted and forced to defend themselves against "Lies & Defamation." There can be no talk about "Forgery" whatsoever, as we have to do only with slightly different versions of "ideas" coming from the same powerful political and economical circle of influence.

ThThe secret society that was organized by Karl Marx and Venedey was in fact only an outgrowth of an older Jewish organization known as "The Jewish League for Culture and Education," which already existed in 1819. The program for this league was taken over by A. Cremieux and further developed.

One easily understands the "Aims" of this "aque" if he reads carefully the letter written by the Jew Baruch Levy to Karl Marx. Here is what he writes:

"The Jewish people taken collectively will be its own Messiah. His reign over the Universe will be obtained by the unification of the human races and through the elimination of frontiers. A Universal Republic will come into being in which the Sons of Israel will become the directing element. We know how to dominate the Masses. The governments of all nations will gradually fall, THROUGH VICTORY OF THE PROLETARIAT, INTO THE HANDS OF JUDAH. All private property will become the possession of the PRINCES OF lSRAEL - they will own the wealth of all lands. Thus will be realized the promise of the TALMUD that when the time of the Messiah comes the Jews will hold under their keys the property of all the peoples of the world."

The spiritual relation between this letter and the "Protocols" is exactly the same as between an acorn and an oak.

ThiThis dreadful plan is transmitted into action in our midst every day.

The "Pan-Europa" a periodical of Count Coudenhove-Calergi proclaimed that the Aristocracy of the future will be Jewish. (In the "New York Times" of April 14, 1933, Samuel Untermyer made a statement to the same effect, claiming that the Jew is the Aristocrat of the world. -Editor.)

The character and behavior of this new "Aristocracy" is substantially different from the old. The names of a Kun (Cohen), Kurt Eisner as well as the Jew-Soviet "Nobility" will be written for all time in world history in letters of blood.

An interesting article appeared in the newspaper "Die Front" published in Zurich, Switzerland on January 3, 1934, which reported that a group of Jews, more powerful and more influential than the Zionists, has organized a "Cultural Movement" on a world-wide scale with the purpose of putting every country under Jewish domination.

Always the same leading idea - not the slightest variation in the program.

The French magazine "Libre Parole" in its issue of November 1933, page 27, and earlier "La Vielle France" issue of March 10, 192 1, published a remarkable speech of Rabbi Reichhorn delivered in Prague in 1869 over the tomb of the Grand Rabbi Simeon-ben-Ihuda; he said in part:

"For centuries the Sons of Israel have been despised and persecuted, but they have fought bravely to prepare the way for victory. Now they are approaching their aim. They already dominate the economic life of the damned Christians; their influence is just as great in politics and in moral fields. At the wished for hour, fixed in advance, we shall let loose the Revolution, which by ruining all classes of Christians will definitely enslave Christendom to us. Thus will be accomplished the promise of God made to his people."

This promise is already accomplished in Russia. What country will be next to experience the same tragic fate? [WOW! -TRY A HOST OF OTHERS SINCE THESE PROPHETIC WORDS WERE WRITTEN IN THE 1930'S!! AND OUR TURN IS COMING SOON IF THE "MASSES" DON'T WAKE UP *NOW*!!-BeWISE]

In a recent issue of the Jewish publication "Freurid von Israel" the editor deplores the fact that the modern Jewish youth seems to have disrespect towards God and his laws. He says, "the Godless Jew seems now to be the master of all Jewish powers. Israel runs the danger of becoming a Satanical race."

A remarkable acknowledgement! This utterance is not made by an anti-semite but by a leader of a Jewish mission!

The bottom line of course is that neither Judaism nor Christianity holds the origin of the truth. Both originate from a much older religion based entirely on Astrology.

The supposed schism between the two religions is purely a political struggle for supremacy engaged in the control of the masses. 

At a higher level the three major religions, Judaism, Christianity and Islam are merged into the same group. 

There is a conspiracy alright but it isn't Jewish or Christian or Islamic these are just being used against each other.

The key word for this conspiracy is not Judaism, nor Christianity nor Islam but


Problem, Reaction, Solution

Create a problem
Observe the reaction
Offer the solution. 

Jordan Maxwell on the Occult